Views of Andrew Jackson in Removing the Cherokee Indians

             These articles, "A Permanent Habitat for the American Indians" and "Memorial of the.

             Cherokee Nation," enlighten the reader to both sides of a very controversial issue in the early.

             1830"s. The views of Andrew Jackson on removing the Cherokee Indians are very biased and very.

             inconsiderate. As a unified nation, the Cherokees very clearly state their position and authenticate.

             their claim to their native lands. Both articles, when combined, provide a very broad base of.

             information, be it opinion or fact, and allow one to obtain significant knowledge about the issue. .

             When one article is weighed up to the next one, a very obvious contrast in style becomes.

             clear. While Andrew Jackson tries to make his desires of moving the Indians seem very necessary.

             and fair, the Cherokee bluntly state that they are opposed to the idea completely. Jackson goes.

             through all of his provisions for the Indians, should they cooperate, as if to coax the addressed.

             person to defend his position. On the other side of the issue, the natives show up everything for.

             what it really is. Jackson"s statements could make anyone think twice about his actions while the.

             Cherokees" side makes it easy to sympathize for them. .

             While laying out the reasons the Indians should be removed, Jackson presents three basic.

             points as to why his actions are justified. First, he explains that every attempt to try and coexist.

             with the Indians has failed. He says that everything that was attempted only went to prove that.

             Americans could not possibly live with the natives on their soil. Next, he explains that the Indians.

             would live best in a country where they were united and protected. By placing them all together in.

             a common area and establishing their land as independent, the native people could more easily.

             lead normal lives. Jackson"s final point is that with the quality of the land that is to be provided.

             and the ample amount of provisions, the Indians will be in a much better situation that their.

Related Essays: