Cherokee Nation," enlighten the reader to both sides of a very controversial issue in the early

1830's. The views of Andrew Jackson on removing the Cherokee Indians are very biased and very

inconsiderate. As a unified nation, the Cherokees very clearly state their position and authenticate

their claim to their native lands. Both articles, when combined, provide a very broad base of

information, be it opinion or fact, and allow one to obtain significant knowledge about the issue.

When one article is weighed up to the next one, a very obvious contrast in style becomes

clear. While Andrew Jackson tries to make his desires of moving the Indians seem very necessary

and fair, the Cherokee bluntly state that they are opposed to the idea completely. Jackson goes

and the ample amount of provisions, the Indians will be in a much better situation that their

government was wrong in even considering removing the Cherokees and other tribes from their

Cherokees' side makes it easy to sympathize for them.

Jackson not only steals their land, but kicks them while they are down?

Jackson statement is simply all the "wonderful" benefits the government will provide for the

present state. The government would rather take care of what they need than continue to fight

Some common words found in the essay are:
Andrew Jackson, Georgia Lastly, Cherokee Indians, Rules Congress, Cherokee Nation, Cherokee Removal, provisions indians, native land, andrew jackson,
Approximate Word count = 588
Approximate Pages = 2 (250 words per page double spaced)