Charles Darwin was born of a wealthy family in the Midlands of England in 1805.1 As a young boy, he was interested in identifying rocks and insects. He tried to get an education in medicine but dropped out. At this point, Darwin was an oridnary Joe living in the country. Then, in 1831, he was invited to travel on a British navel ship, the H.M.

THE FRACTIOUS FRUITFLY. www.flash.net/~rdwillia/Fruitfly.htm: 1998.

It is unfair to toarget Darwin's and Wallace's 150 year old theory of evolution with current information but it is necessary. Evolution suggest that life came from non-life and then became better and better over time. However, the Law of Biogenesis states that life must come from life.13 Simple cells need all of their billions of parts in order to function. In order for evolution to occur, all of those parts would have to come into existance at the same time, same place and work together in perfect order. This is simply not possible; life is far to complex to have resulted in chance (from non-life).14 Evolution, "involves a continual increase of order, of organization, of size, of complexity,..". This contradicts the Second Law of Thermodynamics (universally accepted) which states that all things left to themselves, (without divine intervention) will tend to run down.15 Therefore, it is not possible for something complex and living to come out of something basic and non-living such as gases and water. Consider a non-living object (which is made up of many non-living objects) such as a car, parked in a parking lot for a hundred million years, only to be affected by the elements and natural phenomena. After the hundred million years, the car will be just metal pieces scattered across a large area ("tend to run down"). Evolution suggests that non-living elements that remain in their hostile environment, over time, could come together to form trillion-celled organisms which could imagine. (Imagination isn't necessary for survival, so evolution cannot explain our possession of such a quality).16 Natural Selection says that organisms are suited for their invironment because they evolved into it.17 For the sake of argument, if an organism wasn't suited for its environment, wouldn't it die before it had the chance to suit itself to that environment? (Which, even evolutionists say takes upto hundreds of millions of years). Of course it would! It is more logical and more likely that organisms would be created for their environment rather than evolving into it. Now that scientific law prooves that life cannot come from non-life, and life cannot become more than it already is, I must now show that adaptation or chance cannot defy the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The genetic code from the parent organisms are always enclosed in the DNA fo the offspring. This genetic code is the building instructions for that organism, and since it is a mix of the codes from its parents, it cannot have the genetic ability to become more than its parents and therefore cannot evolve.18 This disprooves the thoery of Natural Selection genetically by contradicting the notion that organisms from one basic kind can mysteriously evolve into another basic kind. Therefore, organisms constantly adapting still cannot change into another organism.19 The chance side which evolutionists say could defy the Second Law of Thermodynamics is the possibilities of mutations. Evolutionary geneticists acknowledge that 99.9% of all observed mutations have a negative effect on the organism.20 However that .1% chance of a good mutation isnt as good as it seems if it is examined in the net effect. If one good mutation ever did occur, it would be competing with almost one thousand harmful mutations. Over time, the net effect/result would be that the harmful mutations will overcome the small amount of good ones and therefore cause the organism to become less functionable and die.21 Also, mutations cannot produce new genetic material or potential, so even the beneficial mutations couldn't have been passed along to the next generations anyways. With all this in mind, it is obvious that Darwin's and Wallace's theory of evolution is untenable. However, now the modern theory of evoltuion must be put to the test.

Some common words found in the essay are:
Piltdown Piltdown, Darwin's Wallace's, Modern Synthesis, Law Thermodynamics, Social Darwinism, Natural Selection, Noble Gases, , America2 Darwin, Charles Darwin, theory evolution, modern theory, modern theory evolution, darwin's wallace's, natural selection, law thermodynamics, education system, wallace's theories, human eye, fruit fly, negative effect, darwin's wallace's theories, malthus' struggle survival, alfred russel wallace, modern synthesis theory,
Approximate Word count = 3714
Approximate Pages = 15 (250 words per page double spaced)