The Heralds article by Tom Akeman titled "Coastal panel questions Measure A"

was a very factual report on measure A and how the coastal commission views measure A. Akeman presented many factual points on what measure A was and how it would affect Monterey County's nature preserves. Amid all of the factual information presented there is definitely an anti measure A attitude from both the reporter and the coastal commission, throughout the article. The author uses many quotes from the Coastal commission's representative Tami Grove, witch don't support measure A. For example Grov

The editor uses many facts to support his opinion of why we don't need measure A, he sarcastically states that "The Pebble Beach company has already committed over 140-acres of Pescadero canyon to open space, after environmental review found it too sensitive to develop. The editor goes on to clarify his opinion of what measure A does, "measure a is nor about halting development. It is about preventing referenda and law suits from halting development." The editorial is closed with the editors opinion of how you should vote on November 7th, he does so be stating "the defeat of measure A just may be the ultimate preservation plan for the Del Monte forest.

Fore instance, to support his opinion Akeman states "The query where the equestrian center might be relocated includes protected wetlands a conservation easement an

Some common words found in the essay are:
Pebble Beach, Tami Grove, Del Monte, Monterey County's, Maxine Hitchcock, Tom Akeman, Spanish Bay, County Herald, , factual information, anti measure, pebble beach, Monterey County, pebble beach company, subjective information, support opinion, reporter includes, county herald, opinion vote, beach company, opinion measure, monterey county herald,
Approximate Word count = 553
Approximate Pages = 2 (250 words per page double spaced)