Part of Socrates great art was to find a reasonable question out of statements given to him. Theaetetus was always asked to answer honestly and without regret the questions that were given to him. Take for example the first question given to him-what is knowledge? Socrates would then focus on the response Theaetetus gave him and determined its credib

Being totally unbiased one can come up with a more rational viewpoint that corresponds to the original (stated in the beginning). Socrates obviously had no intent in demolishing the ideals of Theaetetus and replacing it with his own. Neither is there any evidence that this is what occurred. In fact, examples that Socrates gave not only were to help in illustrating the theory at hand, but as well as showing his frame of thought. Take in to account the example Socrates gives Theaetetus trying to describe if perception is what our senses know and if we know what they tell us is always understood? He gives us the example of foreign language to explain in detail what he's trying to explain. Are we to say that Socrates is not trying to teach Theaetetus how to analyze? Is he not trying to show Theaetetus how to take better criticism of arguments displayed to him? This seems more like the objective Socrates wishes to accomplish with his young pupil. If we keep going down in the same section of the dialogue (163), Theaetetus gives a very in depth answer that in turn gives an implicit statement. The statement is simply that he feels he's in the same state of mind that Socrates is in. Rather than taking pride, Socrates is impressed at Theaetetus's conduct on the handling of the material (implied with "very good indeed").

To be fair and for argument's sake we must find some evidence pointing in the other direction to strengthen the view. There is to some degree a level of difficulty in Socrates teachings, which seem to do the opposite of his intentions. In 210b, Socrates points out to Theaetetus that his definitions are not consistent- "knowledge is neither perception nor true judgement, nor an account added to true judgement". Though, the theories were incorrect on defining knowledge, hasn't his sense of knowledge changed? Not only is Theaetetus ideas and truths washed away but what of his knowledge of courage? He had what seemed to be an enthusiastic approach to difficulties, but what is to be of his ideals now? He's a young boy and to be incorrect in every angle of the matter, there must be a change of ideals. Very clear of this is (in 165d) when Theaetetus states how he has contradicted himself and Socrates points out that this has probably happened more than once. One should view this not negatively but more as evidence of Theaetetus trying to grasp new concepts. Nonetheless his beliefs are altered even if by Socrates standards this is acceptable in hopes of a better thinker.

With both sides one can also come to the conclusion that Socrates is a man who not only changes attitudes but as well as a man that shifts people's understanding of knowledge. Hasn't Socrates explain his point by means of not only using methods that helped visualize but as well as rearranging he's pupils thoughts of the mat

Some common words found in the essay are:
Socrates Theaetetus, Coming Socrates', Theaetetus Socrates, Hasn't Socrates, , Thesis Socrates', socrates theaetetus, answer question, socrates teachings, knowledge socrates, solve philosophical terms, answer question life, helps nurture, theaetetus socrates, theaetetus trying, theaetetus grasp, socrates trying, worldly views,
Approximate Word count = 1902
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page double spaced)