Global Warming 5
As we all know, Global Warming (G.W) has become a major scientific and social issue during the past decade. Global Warming-the increase in greenhouse gasses- has captured broad public attention because it would easily damage the nature and many souci-cultural aspects of life. That's why it should be investigated thoroughly. In the following paragraphs, I will introduce you different approaches of some writers and state their possible answers to this global problem. First of all, although these commentators differentiate in their approaches, they all agree that the greenhouse effect would have catastrophic consequences that can be easily observed on earth. They all chose to begin their articles by identifying what global warming is and the reasons for it. Most of them point out that the greenhouse gasses and particles trap infrared radiation. As a result, the average surface temperatures increase (Schneider, 1989). The reasons that they all figured out are mostly based on too much combustion of fossil fuels and depletion of vegetation cover (Smil, 1990). Then they all indicate possible solutions such as, reducing CO2 combustion and the rate of population growth, in order to solve the problem or at lea
growth and Global Warming. Although all of the writers except Mccullough, mentions about the consequences of G.W., Ross focuses mainly on large-size climate changes. However, Vaclav for example, states that carbon dioxide emission can also be beneficial on productivity depending on the emitted amount. In the end of their articles, both Vaclav, Stephen, Bongaarts and Ross indicate that governmental actions should be taken because waiting would be insufficient and if we wait, we would have to adapt to a larger amount of changes. Whereas Mccullough only focuses on individual actions in order to cope with this problem. In general, their perspectives are much of a same, although they deal with the problem with different approaches. They are all in the recognition this reality and want some kinds of actions to take place instead of waiting and observing how it will go. However, the articles differ in many ways. The ways they explain the issues are not the same. Vaclav Smil discusses about the issue more generally, by giving some historical data and responses from people. For example, he includes the changing rates of secular rise of fossil fuel combustion and conversion of forests and grasslands to crop fields in his article. On the other hand, McCullough only talks abo
Some common words found in the essay are:
Global Warming-the, Realities Responses', Vaclav Smil, Global Warming, GW Ross, Whereas Mccullough, John Bongaarts, Bongaarts Ross, Stephen Schneider, Furthermore Smil, global warming, population growth, vaclav example carbon, large-size climate changes, mainly large-size, focuses mainly, gw ross, ross focuses, large-size climate, consequences gw, climate changes vaclav, changes vaclav example, mccullough mentions, climate changes, mainly large-size climate,
Approximate Word count = 868
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
