-Henry Kissinger (Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs)

In John T Rourke\'s International Politics on the World Stage, a distinction is made between two kinds of power, coercive and persuasive. Coercive power is the power to make another country do something through military force and economic sanctions while persuasive power uses moral authority and technological excellence, which enhance a country\'s image of leadership. Rourke argues that the latter is growing in importance while the former is declining because it is more costly and less effective. The United States is the premier power in the world and with that power comes the obligation to use that power responsibly, and hence, know when it is better to use coercive power and when persuasive power is needed. When the Americans extended the Vietnamese war into the borders of Cambodia, this was a prime example of coercive power. The use of an extensive B-52 campaign without the full knowledge of important Cambodian and Americ

Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger had many great achievements during their tenure, but Cambodia stands as a failure. Though it would be impossible to say that they are at fault for all the terror that Cambodia was to face, they still remain partly responsible. With their bombings of the countryside and their invasion of Cambodia, they managed to create more dismay than they were trying to avert. The coercive manner in which they did this did not help at all, and it only managed to hinder their chances for success. When Nixon announced the invasion of Cambodia, he stated that his action was taken "not for the purpose of expanding the war into Cambodia, but for the purpose of ending the war in Vietnam." If this was so, then why not contact Congress when he wanted to bomb? Nobody could have predicted what was to happen to Cambodia as a result of the violation of its neutrality, and we cannot fault Nixon and Kissinger totally. But there are laws in place, which restrict the power of the President because, sometimes, two heads are better than one and the decision-making process should not rest on the head of only one, or a couple of men, but to a large group that are paid to make these sorts of decisions, who, more often than not, make better decisions than the individual. The reason why coercive power is declining to make room for persuasive power is not only because it is more costly, but also because it is a better decision. Nixon and Kissinger lacked morality when making their decisions and were thinking very selfishly, not taking into account what consequences their actions would have. In 1967, Lyndon Johnson refused to bomb Cambodia because of domestic protest and damage to Cambodia\'s neutrality. He weighed the options and decided it would not be a good idea. Nixon did not weigh the options and the effects were disastrous.

Had Richard Nixon gone to Congress before bombing, maybe the mission would have been conducted with more accuracy and scrutiny, increasing the chances of success. Because Nixon conducted these missions in secrecy, there was much less regard for human life and less contact with people who might have been able to help out the missions. Instead, congress was not given a chance to exercise its constitutional right to decide whether or not to bomb, and the missions failed. After Breakfast, the U.S. sent a group of men into Area 353 to see the damage caus

Some common words found in the essay are:
Richard Nixon, Joint Chiefs, World Stage, Henry Kissinger, Nixon Kissinger, Vietnamese Communists, Cambodian American, Security Adviser, Lon Nol, Charles Meyer, coercive power, richard nixon, human life, persuasive power, chances success nixon, neutral country, war vietnam, bombing cambodia, nixon kissinger, invasion cambodia, falsification documents,
Approximate Word count = 1619
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)