Jackson
I didin’t know Andrew Jackson, but one thing is certain, Jackson was no Al Gore, norewas he a George W. Bush. No, Jackson would be described as “larger than life.” Heimpacted the office of the presidency in ways that live on today. The present day cult of personality that surrounds the office can be traced back to Andrew Jackson. With the likes of James Monroe and John Quincy Adams, who described Jackson as “brutish and savage,” the presidency had been drifting toward a kind of faceless aristocracy. Jackson changed all that. Jackson had that certain intangiable quality known as “charisma,” a qualiity so lacking in both our present day candidates that it might explain the unprecedented difficulty we experienced in declaring a clear-cut winner in the Gore/Bush What is charisma? Among our modern day presidents, Kennedy, Johnson and even Nixon all had it, though certainly not the same aspects of it. Charisma does not necessarily equate with “charm” though this is part of it, and probably the largest part of Kennedy’s charisma and the least of Nixon’s. Nor does charisma equate to leadership qualities. Rather charisma relates to certain aspects of a man’s personality or character
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Gore Bush, Nixons Nor, National Bank, White House, Federal Bank, Quincy Adams, South Carolinas, Clinton Jacksons, Bush Jackson, Johnson Nixon, national bank, democratic party jackson, jacksons charisma, common voice, democratic party, executive branch, jackson countered, andrew jackson, aspects personality, central bank, party jackson,
Approximate Word count = 1085
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
 |