I will illustrate this by examining elements used to define critical thinking and decision-making. Then I will compare the differences between "the book" definition and my personal interpretation of critical thinking and decision-making. I will also discuss how they relate to each other and the benefits of being a critical think

My interpretation is that critical thinking means the ability to carefully consider and analyze with sound judgement every aspect of any problem or situation. I depict decision making as the art of examining any given situation thoroughly and by achieving this helps produce several primary or alternate courses of action that could accomplish the same task with minimal obstacles, risks, or injury.

Based on my personal experience as an equal opportunity advisor, in the 25th Infantry Division Artillery (Light), I have had to apply critical thinking to many racial, gender, and sexual harassment complaints. I have had to ensure all the information I received from both parties involved in the dispute are precise, accurate and most of all relevant to the complaint. After receiving the complaint and carefully identifying all the facts, I then have to apply the decision making process. My job requires me to advise the brigade commander. I must be

Some common words found in the essay are:
Southern California, Thinking Decision, Artillery Light, Richard Paul, critical thinking, critical thinking decision, thinking decision, thinking decision-making, critical thinking decision-making, courses action, interpretation critical thinking, benefits critical thinker, critical thinker finally, critical thinker, decision process, accurate relevant, precise accurate, benefits critical, differences book,
Approximate Word count = 636
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)