The End of Fossil Fuels
Ever since the industrial revolution the earth's energy needs have mainly depended on the use of the burning of fossil fuels, and why not? Fossil fuels take care of 87% of the world's energy needs including electricity, heating, transportation, and have enabled the evolution of large modern cities and a modern infrastructure to ship people and goods all over the planet. It is also cheap and convenient for companies to acquire fossil fuels. (Palfreman) There are many drawbacks to the use of fossil fuels and one of them being the polluting that it does to our planet. There have been many alternatives to the way that we acquire our energy, and each one has been considered by the different scientists and politics that study this issue that the world faces. These people all seem to be on the same side, and that is to find a different energy source that can replace fossil fuel, but they all hold different facts and opinions that will determine what would best suit the people and Earth. The groups of people that tend to take side of the continuing of the burning of fossil fuels are the oil companies and the economist. Oil companies obviously want nothing to do with the start of alternative fuels even though they are better for th
For a person that is for alternative fuels, there are many arguments that could back up their opinions. Gas prices are rising because of the lack of supply of fossil fuels and also the conservation of it. The pollution is a large factor with the effects of carbon dioxide causing global warming and the greenhouse effect. Fossil fuels are running out too so there needs to be a long-term solution in our future. Also, there are many different types of alternative fuels like: hydroelectric, propane, nuclear, solar, and electrical. If we lived in a perfect world then the solution to this controversy would come easy, but we don't so there is going to have to be some compromising and cooperation by the oil companies, politics, and the citizens. Some possible solutions could be done with some government interference. I don't know a lot about how politics work but maybe the government can not allow the oil companies to buy out the companies that make the alternative vehicles and this could allow the process of getting these cars more commonly on the road much quicker. Another way to go about the problem is to set more money aside to scientists and biologists to do more studying on the different ways that energy can be made and just hope that they find a way before the atmosphere is too bad or we run out of fossil fuels. On the flip side of the issue, scientists have done the most in informing the public on the effects of the carbon dioxide (CO2) that humans have let into the atmosphere. Scientist, as well as biologists, seems to push the use of alternative fuels because they see the effects of what fossil fuels are doing to the earth's atmosphere. Testing done in Maina Loa in Hawaii show that since 1957, the time period of the industrial revolution, carbon dioxide has risen by a third. Each year 7 billion tons of carbon (eventually turning into 20 billion tons of
Some common words found in the essay are:
, Greener Alternative, Alt Fuel, Loa Hawaii, Alternative Fuels, McCloy D10, fossil fuels, alternative fuels, Mindy Hutensky, oil companies, carbon dioxide, burning fossil, burning fossil fuels, gasoline diesel fuel, octane gasoline, promote alternative, carbon sources, fuels running, natural gas, fossil fuels running, effects carbon dioxide,
Approximate Word count = 1271
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
