Yet many people believe that these laws that protect the environment are unjust because they prevent mankind from reaching his zenith in his abilities. Lawmakers in Congress, many backed by businessmen that would like to see many of these restrictive laws repealed, lobby for extending the quotas on these laws or repealing them altogether. They argue that these protections for the environment cost taxpayers (who plead with the government for a lowering in the amount of taxes that they have to pay) deserve less of a pinch in the wallet.

Still, many people do not understand exactly how necessary these laws are. The damage that was being done did not just stop when it was noticed. A tragic fact about pollution is that it is a lot cheaper and easier to pollute than to clean up the pollution or to follow guidelines as to what to do with the pollution and how to dispose of it properly. Many businesses were, and are, unwilling to willingly spend money that then could otherwise turn into a profit. The damage we cause today by dumping waste into the ocean or creating more smog in the city will very unlikely be seen by those who create it. It will become the problem of his children and his children's' children. Laws concerning environmental protection attempt to reduce the causes of environmental damage today to reduce the amount of damage that they cause in the future.

These laws are morally acceptable because they attempt to do a righteous and good-natured deed. Our morals, or our beliefs in what is morally acceptable according to society and its standards, are a driving force behind the creation of these laws and their usefulness. They attempt to right a wrong. They are acceptable and morally upright because of these reasons.

f problems that we are still just learning about.

And removing older grass and brush along with dead and downed timber from the forest floor will give the younger and newer plants a greater chance at growing to maturity by not having to compete with others for space and water to live and grow.

Morality of The Laws: In almost everyone of our philosophy classes, we have had a discussion over whether something is or is not appropriate. And in addition to that, we would discuss what makes our decisions appropriate. Was or was not the issue morally correct and why. Normally we would come to the conclusion that societies beliefs on the issue decided whether or not the issue is morally appropriate or inappropriate. The same applies here. Laws that limit the amount of toxins that harm the environment and laws that prevent us from destroying the environment were developed by people. Societies beliefs and ideas on environmental protection were fundamental in creating the law and exactly what its' intent is. Therefo

Some common words found in the essay are:
Morality Laws, Lawmakers Congress, Industrial Age, , dead timber, laws protect, protect environment, morally appropriate, environmental protection, laws protect environment, prevent damage, limit amount, goal law limits, timber forest, damage cause, morally acceptable, main goal law, prevent lumber companies, reduce amount damage,
Approximate Word count = 1869
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page double spaced)