To Clone or not to Clone
On February 24, 1997, the whole world was shocked by the news that Scottish scientists had successfully cloned a sheep. Dolly an artificially cloned mammal was born a star. After the shock, that cloning was not only a possibility but a reality, wore off the out cry against human cloning began. Physicians, scientists, politicians and church leaders and many more have been trying to ban the cloning of humans ever since. Is cloning something to be afraid of? I do not believe it is. I believe that cloning will become a tool of science that will, in time, bring many benefits to humankind.The Microsoft Encarta Encyclopedia describes a clone as "an organism by an asexual (nonsexual) reproductive process"(clone 1). This definition means that we already have many clones on the earth today. The Microsoft Encarta Encyclopedia also states that "the organisms known as prokaryotes (the bacteria and cyanobacteria), a number of other simple organisms, such as most protozoan, many other algae, and some yeast’s, also reproduce primarily by cloning, as do certain higher organisms like the dandelion or aspen tree"(clone 1). The Biology Textbook Concepts and Connections describes a clone as "a single organis
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Gregory Pence, Advisory Commission, Conclusion Altogether, Andy Coghlan, Introduction February, Somatic Transfer, Birth Defects, Encarta Encyclopedia, Advisory Committee, Transplantation Cloning, therapeutic cloning, embryo splitting, birth defects, nuclear somatic, national bioethics, bioethics advisory, nuclear somatic transfer, national bioethics advisory, encarta encyclopedia, somatic transfer, please diagram labeled, oxford rowman, lanham boulder york, describes clone, boulder york oxford,
Approximate Word count = 1523
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
 |
