The Webster's World Dictionary gave this definition for Recombiant DNA: "DNA formed in the laboratory by splicing together pieces of DNA from different species, as to create new life forms." This is wrong why would anyone want to create a new life form? The effects could be very dangerous the life on the earth. The author on recombiant DNA says:

Public reaction to the use of recombiant DNA in the genetic engineering has been mixed. The production of medicines through the use of genetically altered organisms has gene

These few examples here are just a small amount of information against cloning. There are people who have devoted most of their web sites on the reasons why cloning is a bad idea. The examples were only on: the effects of making a new species, possible outcome of human race. That's not worth taking a chance on cloning.

Some of the research on cloning suggests that human clones would have a wide array of emotional dysfunction and social limitations. Just think how we would feel if we knew how long our lives would be or what diseases we were going to get. We would spend our whole lives living in fear of sickness and death. This would cause major emotional problems. In addition, clones could easily become outcasts because so many people are against cloning. Some people would just feel to weird talking to someone who looked just like someone else. And ho

Some common words found in the essay are:
Aaron Hawley, Health NIH, DNA Public, DNA DNA, Wrong Cloning, recombiant dna, human race, World Dictionary, birth defects, create life, Recombiant DNA, disease birth defects, genetic material, cloning people, dna experiments, disease birth, recombiant dna experiments,
Approximate Word count = 578
Approximate Pages = 2 (250 words per page double spaced)