international criminal court
In the United States when a criminal goes from state to state it is hard to tell who has jurisdiction over the case. This is a problem because different states have different laws. Also different states may have more sever punishment for a crime than another state. The same is true for international criminals. Many a time a criminal will leave the country in which they have committed the crime so as to avoid prosecution. Then the country they go to will not extradite them back to the country the crime was committed in and the criminal gets off with no punishment. Or, sometimes there are international criminals. Who prosecutes them? Countries often have radically different legal systems. Some countries are more radical about the steps they take against criminals then others. All these questions have been arising. Many seem to think the answer is in the creation of an international criminal court. An international criminal court was created. It was adopted on July 17, 1998. But what was the thinking behind it? What were the steps taken to create this international criminal court? What countries favored it and which ones were opposed to it? Let's now take a l
Originally, a lot of the work to establish this international criminal court was being done by the French government as well as the government of Trinidad and Tobago. The war crimes that were committed during the war between Bosnia-Herzgovina and Croatia as well as the issues that arose with the extradition from Libya have caused many other counties to get behind and support the establishment of an international criminal court. The idea for an international criminal court is not a new idea but rather it is one hundred years old. Many crimes and many criminals have gone unpunished because they do not fall under one country's jurisdiction. Genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity have all gone unpunished. Will this international criminal court be successful? It will struggle without the support of some of the major countries, such as the United States, support. The intentions are good. Finally the terrible crimes that have gone unpunished for so long can be dealt with. Peace of mind can be given to those who are persecuted. The world can be a safer place with the success of this court. The third way was for the General Assembly to pass a resolution. This would have made the court a smaller part of the General Assembly. This would give the court the support of many countries without needing the support of all five Security Council member countries. It would also not need to go through a ratification process. But the problem with this is that according to the charter of the United Nations the General Assembly does not have the power to do such things. ook at the answers to these questions. So what will the international criminal court be like once it
Some common words found in the essay are:
Security Council, Court United, President Clinton, Australia European, Bosnia-Herzgovina Croatia, United Nation's, international criminal court, international criminal, criminal court, United Nations, United Nation, Nations Assembly, Trinidad Tobago, war crimes, security council, establishment international, establishment international criminal, united nations, five security council, crimes humanity, genocide war, gone unpunished, treaty united, genocide war crimes, thirds united nation,
Approximate Word count = 1151
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
