At some point in the future, the right to bear arms will be so limited that it will just be a natural move to ban firearms altogether. The Government believes that the banning or restricting of the right to keep and bear arms will decrease violence. This has been the demand for the Government movement against gun rights for years. If you really think about it though, this notion is simply absurd. To demonstrate you must first separate Americans into two general categories. First there are the upstanding citizens who work to support themselves and/o

There are two opposing sides in the fight for individual rights. There is the public, full of individuals, against the government. I fall into the category of individuals, and my opponents include the Chief Justice. I cannot respect the opinions and articles of those who have agendas other than to spread the truth. I ask you why should we listen to the spokesmen or puppets of the government's movement against our rights. How many rights do we have to lose before our fellow countrymen see the truth

There are many studies that support this idea that more gun control results in more crime, but the idea is so basic, it almost needs no confirmation to know that it's true. The United States Government would like us to stop using our brains and picture the whole world holding hands, singing out in harmony because guns no longer exist. What some government officials and politicians are trying to do here is interpret the constitution, and they are doing that through their own biases and opinions. The politician's state in many articles that the government and militia were made of the people of the communities at the time the constitution was written. Why then d

Some common words found in the essay are:
United Government, Chief Justice, bear arms, Bear Arms, united government, constitution written, chief justice, gun rights, can't gun, gun control,
Approximate Word count = 783
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)