Kant explains that there are both analytic and synthetic judgments. Analytic judgments are those truths that are self-contained while synthetic judgments are the combining of two ideas to form a completely new idea. He also explains that there are both experiences that are a posteriori and those that are a priori. A posteriori is the knowledge that depends on experience and therefore is defined as 'after experience'. A priori on the other hand is knowledge that can be known 'prior to experience'.

Knowing this, we can conclude that analytic a posteriori are not possible. One cannot have a self-contained knowledge of something after an experience. Kant also explains to us that analytic a priori are in fact possible. For instance, the statement 'all bodies are extended things' is an exampl

e of analytic a priori. This is because we know that this is true before seeing all of the bodies in the world. Analytic a priori are therefore

Another example of this would be if you were to take clay, which is equivalent to sensations, and put it into a tool that shaped the clay. The tool would be comparable to the sensory apparatus and the shape of the clay after going through the tool would be the experience. The clay without some kind of tool to give form to it would be just a blob of clay. The shape of the hole that is in the tool in which the clay comes out of would resemble the synthetic a priori concept, but even so, the shape of the hole without any clay to shape is not shaping. If you can see what the shape of the hole is than you can imagine what the shape of whatever is squeezed through it. This is exactly what synthetic a priori judgments are.

Regardless of the ability an individual may have to recognize subconscious stimuli, or call upon the subconscious psyche, knowledge and correlations of past experience will formulate to produce what Kant calls synthetic a priori judgments. Although I believe it not to be achievable to make synthetic a priori judgments I give Kant credit in trying to explain a way of going about coming up with experiences before even presenting him/herself to them. One can easily guess at what the an experience will be before ever coming in contact with it but there is no way to prove that this experience

Some common words found in the essay are:
Hume Kant, , Pure Reason, synthetic priori, David Hume, synthetic priori judgments, priori judgments, analytic priori, rainy day, shape hole, clay tool, 'a rainy day, pure natural, kant explains analytic, throwing rationalism, pure natural science, clay shape, universal reason, rainy day wet,
Approximate Word count = 993
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)