I believe that it would be better for the human race to live in a world where moral universalism is the accepted worldview. I believe this because moral universalism almost offers the world a moral view that has no conflicts, no differences and has no bias. It will become clear why I think that moral universalism is the moral way of thinking throughout this essay. A valid explanation of what moral universalism is and how it can positively affect whole countries let alone whole nations will be provided.

Ideally, moral universalism offers a world that will have no moral disagreements due to the fact that universally everyone thinks in the same way and manner about morals in general. As you might agree, this would be unrealistic, but nevertheless a pure society based on moral universalism would uphold those values. With a universal train of thought focused upon morals that do not differ from one individual to the next there is no room for opinions or bias. Moral universalism makes morals have a universal validity. This one-way train has no intersections or choices or differences. Universally we are all aboard the same train, which would eliminate thousands of conflicts happening today aro

If we analyze briefly one aspect of moral universalism, we can see that with no moral differences there would be no disputes as I have said above but most of all due to the lack of disputes, there would not be conflicting governments. There might not even be more than one government! The result of such a change would be that there would be world peace. No more wars, no more hatred. To a certain extent we would seem to be a robotic entity surviving on a planet trying to technologically advance ourselves in order to discover the unknown.

und the world due to a different moral system (i.e.: the battles between religions). As Thomas Hurka says on the concept of tolerance and how we should not impose our values on other people:

Robert Streiffer, Moral Relativism and Reasons for Action, B.A. Reed College 1993.

"The ideal of tolerance is, at least to a point, attractive. But it actually contradicts relativism. That's because the ideal is presented as one that is binding on everyone: everyone in every culture should refrain from imposing their values. But that's a universal and objective statement!" (P.112, Principals; Short Essays on Ethics, Thomas Hurka)

Thomas Hurka, Principles Short Essays on Ethi

Some common words found in the essay are:
Ruth Benedict, Moral Universalism, James Rachel, Thomas Hurka, moral universalism, world moral, moral universalism worldview, Journal Philosophy, House Inc, Cultural Relativism, moral system, universalism worldview, Reed College, Harcourt Brace, thomas hurka, Essays Ethics, moral universalism offers, imposing values, bias moral, universalism moral, short essays, essays ethics, offers world moral, universalism offers world, refrain imposing values,
Approximate Word count = 817
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)