Plato
One of the most influential minds in western philosophy is that of Plato. Plato lived from 422-347 B.C, was born into an aristocratic family in the city of Athens. He was a student of Socrates and a teacher of Aristotle. Plato followed the basic ideas of Socrates, in which no laws are to be broken despite their relevance. He makes clear why laws should be followed and why disobedience to the law is rarely justified. Plato wrote a book called The Republic. It contains ideas about a society and citizens who lived within that society would act. He believed in an ideal state. According to Plato it was divided into three classes. They were rulers, auxiliaries, and the laborers. He believed that the rulers should be philosophers because they were the most wise and intelligent thinkers, while the auxiliaries had to be courageous and strong willed. Laborers had the virtue of temperance and they were considered to be the middle management. In Plato's perfect world, slaves didn't exist and women were considered an equal. Within Plato's ideal state, sets of laws for the inhabitants were made in order to allow the society to function to its greatest ability. Plato would have viewed civil disobedience as unnecessary in his idea
As a result, civil disobedience, according to Plato and his ideal state, would be unnecessary. Civil disobedience has brought about important changes in the law and government policy. In Plato's ideal state there would be no need for civil disobedience because the laws would be set in such a way that would benefit everyone. If laws were only set to serve and protect the people, and would not prevent them from following their beliefs, Plato would find no reason why civil disobedience was necessary. On the other hand, if a law was considered to be unjust, Plato would change his perspective to the other point of view. than likely to be a corrupter of the young his highest part, reason or mind. The ideal is a just man with each part of his nature functioning in its proper way. But man can destroy this harmony." In Plato's ideal state, he would feel that civil disobedience would have no relevance. He felt this because if the laws were suitable they were only there to help everyone reach true happiness. Considering the fact that every human being has the right to argue and justify their choices, you don't have to necessarily have to obey everything that you are told unless laws will be disobeyed. In addition, no one would have any desire to disobey the laws that were made because no one would disagree with them. He felt that all laws were important, but if they were unjust and not considered very strict in punishment that was to follow the actions, then one is able to defy the law. This is because one should stand up for everything in which they believe. and foolish portion of mankind. Disobedience can Justice is based on the idea of good, which is the harmony o
Some common words found in the essay are:
Nevertheless Plato, According Plato, Aristotle Plato, Plato Plato, civil disobedience, , laws set, plato's ideal, laws set benefit, justice conditions human, laws followed disobedience, rarely justified, plato believed, disobedience law, followed disobedience, viewed civil, conflict claims, civil disobedience unnecessary, law rarely, conditions human society,
Approximate Word count = 1140
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
|