99,000 Essays & Term Papers: Where You Buy Essays and Papers Online
Direct Essays, Where You Can Buy Essays and Papers Online

Instant Access to Buy Essays and Papers Online!
Acceptable Use Policy
Customer Service
Site Search


Login to View Essays and Papers Online

Join Now - Instant Access to Essays and Research Papers!

  Essay and Research Paper Topics
Acceptance Essays
Arts Essays
Custom Essays
English Literature Essays
Foreign
History Essays
Miscellaneous Research Papers and Essays
Movie Essays and Papers
Music Term Papers
Novels
People and Biography Research Papers
Politics Research Papers
Religion Research Papers
Science Essay Topics
Sports Research Papers
Technology Research Papers
 
  FAQ
Technical Support
Site Map
Direct Essays
 

 



Welcome to Direct Essays

This is a short summary of this paper!

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!


Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900
Special! View this paper for FREE!
  

Innocence In Plato's Apology

In Plato's dialogue "Apology," Socrates is forced to defend his actions and beliefs to a jury against both official charges brought against him by Meletus and unofficial charges, which Socrates argues throughout the trial. Before the jury, Socrates attempted to justify himself and explain how this slander against him arose. This began with Chaerophon's trip to the Oracle at Delphi and conclusion the Pythian priestess gave that no one was wiser than Socrates. Socrates puzzled over this for some time and unsure whether the priestess was correct began a personal investigation by going to those who appeared to be wise and conversing with them with the expressed purpose of proving the oracle wrong. The charges came about after Socrates had been involved with many of the citizens of Athens over the years. While citizens engaged in discussions with Socrates, many had their beliefs and values questioned and cast into doubt. The response to this was most often confusion and anger. Over the years, this anger took the form of a general resentment against Socrates. Socrates could only conclude that he knew of no one who was wise, including himself, in that he believed his ignorance far outweighed the ignorance of others. These il


As one takes in these reasons for Socrates innocence, some members of the jury could have raised the objection that Socrates is using rhetorical tricks, such as rephrasing the issues, using literary illusions, and claiming from the start that he would not use the devices of a sophist to help his cause, in order to mislead the jury. Suppose for a moment that this was true. While Socrates never claimed to be a sophist, he was undoubtedly a truth seeker. Socrates lived his life seeking definitions and knowledge, not from his personal thoughts and ideas, but by asking others what they felt was, for example, justice and piety. While in the course of these actions Socrates may have in fact used devices such as literary illusions in order to open the eyes of the one he was conversing with in order to explain and demonstrate how another side of their definition or conviction could be viewed. This is hardly a rhetorical trick, or even a criminal action. Socrates was also not misleading the jury in any way, Socrates never apologized for his actions but defended them, in a way pronouncing his own guilt of these charges of which no guilt should befall him. He was extremely straightforward in telling them that yes, he discussed things with the youth, through their own free will, never forcing his own ideas and beliefs upon them. As stated earlier, Socrates did not think of himself as a wise man, he even went as far as to refer to himself as ignorant. Some might accuse him of using this statement as a rhetorical trick however; as stated earlier he did not deny the charges against him directly. Still one could accuse him of using these rhetorical tricks in order to lure the youth to listen to him, despite his claim that they listened to his teaching on their own free will. This could also be true, but one must put this idea into another perspective and decide for oneself if this is in fact the case. People in general enjoy being entertained go to great lengths in order to be entertained. These means of entertainment can be anything from plays to speakers that one finds personally interesting. One must also realize that there is not always truth in what they hear and learn from these modes of entertainment, but one should be able to attend these functions and walk away from them taking only what they feel is needed for growth in their personal lives. Socrates works in this same manner. He is, in a way an entertainer, speaking to those who want to hear, much like a play in which the audience realizes the content is fiction, yet attends despite that fact. No one accuses playwrights and actors of corrupting the youth when in fact they lure in the youth using what could be considered a rhetorical trick, acting. Socrates simply discusses his beliefs some feel that he uses these tricks to lure them into listening and there is nothing wrong in believing that. However, those who believe this are very insecure about how their own beliefs and can be carelessly shaped and molded. When someone overhears others involved in a discussion, for instance about the benefits of killing their family, they should be secure enough in their own beliefs to decide if there is merit to what is being discussed, despite the tricks used to lure someone into listening to them. These arguments should in themselves provide ample evidence to prove Socrates innocent of the biased and partially unfounded charges brought against him. The evidence set before the jury as well as the lack of evidence presented should give the jury no other choice but to find Socrates innocent. If however the jury is so biased and misled as to find him guilty, then a p

Some common words found in the essay are:
Apology Socrates, Socrates Socrates, Athens Socrates, charges brought, Oracle Delphi, citizens athens, guilty verdict, ideas beliefs, , penalty death, surrounded corrupt, rhetorical trick, argument worse, tricks lure, corrupting youth, official charges brought, tricks lure listening, using rhetorical tricks, charges brought meletus, charges brought socrates,
Approximate Word count = 2458
Approximate Pages = 10 (250 words per page double spaced)


  

More Essays on Innocence In Plato Apology

Democracy through Platoamp39s Apology of Socrates1503 words
Platos Apology660 words
Socrates The Apology1075 words
socrates1209 words
Socrates: The Apology2099 words

Look at even more essays on Innocence In Plato Apology
More Misc Essays

Professional Papers:
Rousseauamp39s Interpretation of Sovereignty of Religion4601 words
Philsophical ampamp Social Context of Rousseauamp39s Ideas4540 words
Influence of Religion on Politics in Ancient Greece2504 words
Special! View this paper for FREE!
Click here to JoinNow!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check
Click here to Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900

 

All papers and essays are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright 2002-2009 Direct Essays , LLC. All Rights Reserved. DMCA
Webmasters make $$$$
Saved Papers