In modern courts, defendants have certain definite rights. Examples of such are the right to an unbiased jury, the right to an attorney, and the right not to incriminate one's self. In reading The Crucible, one becomes appalled at how these rights are never even acknowledged. Not only are they not acknowledged, but the exact opposite is a normal expectation by the characters in the book! The jury is made up of the very people accusing the people of witchcraft. Mr. Hale is denied a lawyer because the Judge Danforth does not believe there i

While the rights of the characters in The Crucible are never even vocalized, our current justice system is supposedly based on the aforesaid rights. We all know what our basic rights are, and seemingly take them for granted. But, even though the government tries to enforce these rights, the media nullifies them. Because of the way news of court hearings is relayed to us, our nation as a social whole has taken on an attitude of "guilty until proven innocent." Even then, if found innocent, most people will still look at the party as guilty. Punishment is still inflicted. Society makes the accused party into a pariah. Certainly, the accused have rights in the modern United States, but are those rights are made pointless. Take a look at O.J. Simpson and his murder trial or the Clintons and the Whitewater trial.

s anything more that can be brought to light on the situation. The accused are basically given two terrible choices; they may either sign papers incriminating themselves and spend the rest of their life in a living hell, or be hanged. Is this justice? No one in their right mind can bring themselves to even compa

Some common words found in the essay are:
Clintons Whitewater, Judge Danforth, Crucible People's, Clarence Darrow, OJ Simpson, guilty proven innocent, accused rights, guilty proven, proven innocent,
Approximate Word count = 764
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)