Debate of human cloning

In the past few years, human cloning has gone from a laboratory fantasy to a global debate. There are many arguments supporting both negative and positive effects of human cloning. Human cloning raises a lot of challenging questions about human liberty, dignity, and identity. Will human cloning be a great step for man, or will it lead to moral abyss? This question is asked all the time. With great research one would realize that with the implementation of human cloning, there would be a huge medical and non-medical advancement. People with superior or mental attributes would be cloned, large armies could be created, single and infertile parents could have children, and certain species could be saved from extinction. In contrast to all the positives of human cloning, there are more negatives related to the subject, mostly moral and ethical negatives coming from ethicists, psychologists, theologians and the church, as well as many mandated laws against the cloning of humans. Cloning could also cause a serious overpopulation crisis.

The first major point in favor of human cloning is that cancer patients would

. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Cloning Foundation, Human Cloning, Genetic Encore, Newton Einstein, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Clint Eastwood, human cloning, Michael Jordan, Saddam Hussein, Albert Einstein, MSU Mississippi, superhuman fighters, human cloning foundation, cloning foundation, ebscohost msu mississippi, ebscohost msu, cloning human, msu mississippi, mississippi 26, able clone, msu mississippi 26, immune diseases, mississippi 26 february, 1998 health, plus ebscohost msu,
Approximate Word count = 2387
Approximate Pages = 10 (250 words per page double spaced)