Cloning: Why we shouldn't be a
You have been told that you are unique. The belief that there is no one else like you in the whole world made you feel special and proud. This belief may not be true in the future. The world was stunned by the news in late February 1997 that a British embryologist named Ian Wilmut and his research team had successfully cloned a lamb named Dolly from an adult sheep. Dolly was created by replacing the DNA of one sheep's egg with the DNA of another sheep's udder. While plants and lower forms of animal life have been successfully cloned for many years now, before Wilmut's announcement it had been thought by many to be unlikely that such a procedure could be performed on higher mammals. The world media was immediately filled with heated discussions about the ethical implications of cloning. Some of the most powerful people in the world have felt compelled to act against this threat. President Clinton swiftly imposed a ban on federal funding for human-cloning research. Bills are in the works in both houses of Congress to outlaw human cloning which it taken to be a fundamentally evil thing that must be stopped. But what is exactly bad about it? From an ethical point of view , it is difficult to see exactly what is wrong with clon
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Ok Nature, Bill Clinton, Federal Government, Ian Wilmut, Napoleon's Tomb, Near East, President Clinton, Word Adam's, Sustainer Ruler, , human cloning, argument cloning, cloning research, family relationship, dna sheep's, in-vitro fertilization, health care, successfully cloned,
Approximate Word count = 1326
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
