e criminal imposed. The author gives his objections against the death penalty. He states that capital punishment is "morally unacceptable thirst for revenge"; he means that someone should not be punished out of revenge of what the criminal did. In his second objection he states that innocent people may be put to death by convicting a wrong person. "We cannot compensate the death". His third objective is that capital punishment denies a criminal dignity as a human being. Lois Pojman is against capital punishment.

My opinions on the articles are that they all make really good points. I think we should abolish the death penalty unless the crime is real serious. In the wake of the Oklahoma City bombing and the debate over Timothy Mcvieh, I think for the victims to get over what he did and put it behind them, I think he

Some common words found in the essay are:
Louis PPojman, Thurgood Marshall, Penalty Ernest, Ernest Van, Immanual Kant, capital punishment, death penalty, Den Haag, Lois Pojman, Timothy Mcvieh, Oklahoma City, den haag, , penalty capital punishment, penalty capital, explains capital, morally unacceptable, van den, ernest van, criminal death, van den haag, ernest van den, explains capital punishment,
Approximate Word count = 558
Approximate Pages = 2 (250 words per page double spaced)