In a world that revolves around impressions, many people that it is very important to look your best at all times. We are constantly seeing images of the "perfect body". From Barbie to Baywatch, American women are constantly being shown images of girls with eighteen inch waists, thirty two inch hips and a D cup chest. Feeling as if they need to achieve this image to be attractive, women flock to the exercise gym in large numbers. They spend two hours a day exercising to achieve that tiny waistline that they desire. They are not satisfied with the chest that God gave them so they also want to alter this aspect of their body. In the past, women did chest exercises to enhance their bustline. As they got smarter, they realized that all that they were doing is enlarging the muscle and in fact minimizing their bustline. In today's age of technology, scientist have developed a way to surgically inhance the size of women's bustlines. By surgically inserting silicone bags into the breast, women everywhere had the opportunity to achieve the most desirable bustline. A surgery originally intended for reconstructive purposes, by 1990 eighty percent of all implants

Many women have experienced numerous health problems as a result of their breast augmentation surgeries. From rheumatoid arthritis to severe weight loss, they have been through severe pain. It is even rumored that silicone from the ruptured implant will remain trapped inside the fibrous capsule of the scar tissue. The trauma occurred by the patients with ruptured implants was very severe, and someone should be reliable for the pain and suffering of the patients. Due to the fact that the manufacturer put their product on the market without performing suffienct safety tests, I feel that it is the responsibility of the company to compensate the women for their pain as a result of the inefficiency of the manufacturer, Dow Chemical.

The company is wrong in its theory of why it is not responsible for the damages caused by the ruptured breast implants. Though the FDA classified implants as a "Class II" devise, not requiring testing, it is still the responsibility of the company to make sure that they are not endangering human lives by the use of their product. The FDA concluded that thie procedure is not a major threat. Major-- that is the key word. It is a threat and as a result, the company should be responsible for the damages. A human is a very special creation from God and its life should not be taken lightly. The company was only thinking of themselves and their money when they put this product on the market. They should ask themselves if they would let their daughter put this in their body. If they would have done this, they would have never put their product on the market. Regarding the fact that the lack hard core evidence illeviates the company from all responsibility, that is an unwarranted judgement. Hard core facts are necessary but with such great numbers of women who all have the same symptoms and who nothing else in common except their breast implants, the only logical explanation for their symptoms is the explosion of the implants. Silicone is in no way good for the body. Hard core evidence or not, it is not right to make the patients suffer without compensation. It is the responsibility of the manufacturer to provide just compensation. Lastly, they are exactly right the implants were not one hundred percent fail free. There is always a margin of error. Were the comanies went wrong is that they did not tell the consumer that they were not one hundred percent fail free, therefore they have a moral obligation towards the patient. If they would have told the patient that there was a health risk involved in their procedure th

Some common words found in the essay are:
Dow Chemical, Class II, Baywatch American, Conclusion United, II Thesis, Class III, Chemical Company, IV Rebuttal, Implants Thesis, dow chemical, Dow Chemicals, responsible damages, hundred percent, breast implants, hard core, hundred percent fail, fail free, ruptured bags, product market, silicone implants, manufacturer responsible, percent fail free, manufacturer responsible damages, dow chemical company, ruptured breast implants,
Approximate Word count = 1736
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page double spaced)