t of Nicholos II, which he believed he had complete authority over one hundred and twenty million subjects did not match his "soft" tsar personality. He was known to be a very quiet and shy person and preferred to spend hours in the company of his wife and children rather than deal with political matters, especially when it will lead to his eventually downfall. The Tsar's character became a greater problem when opposition began to arise towards the ideal he inherited from a long line of ancestors. Many revolutionaries resented the autocratic rule and power the tsar had. But the tsar could do little to prevent a popular revolt. Joel Charmichael stated in his book, A History of Russia was that the tsar "...was sadly outmatched by circumstances." Although his weak character did influence the leading up to the Revolution even a monarch with a powerful and passionate ruler would most likely have failed to restore order after constant demonstrations with the tsar as the burden. But the position the tsar had inherited still required a person to cope with it, but the tsar couldn not only cope with it, "He seemed unable...to understand what was happening." (232 Charmichael) The tsar had no idea what was going on outside of the palace due to his role as a father and husband he preferred despite the role he was expected to play. "Bloody Sunday" was an outcome of popular unrest. Fathe

Some common words found in the essay are:
Nicholos II, Father Gapon, History Russia, Despite Russia, Tsar Nicholos, Empress Russia, World War, Nicholos II's, Alexander III, Russian Revolution, nicholos ii, russo-japanese war, russian revolution, alexander iii, russo-japanese war left, weak character, economic downswing, move bad, russia lost, character influence, war left,
Approximate Word count = 930
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)