In One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich Solzhenitsyn attempts to indirectly attack/insult Stalin as well as the Union of Soviet Writers by using a comparative setting. He does this by making the setting as realistic as possible while injecting Shukhov, who plays as the "average" man being cheated, taken advantage of, and put in the camp for a dishonorable and wrong reason. However Shukhov's view of the camp is not realistic, but rather, understanding. By making the camp appear manageable and forgiving through Shukhov's eyes the actual horror of the camp is intensified. Such was the case when discussing food: Shukhov sewing bread into his mattress and feeling impressed with himself at his ingenuity, getting two bowls of oatmeal at lunch break with incredible luck and engineering, and the fact that along the line of power everyone takes a piece of everything until it eventually trickles
down to him. The fact that these acts occur is not nearly as frightening as the fact that Shukhov is completely comfortable with them, and that he knows that in order to succeed, or even survive, an inmate has to be cunning, quick, and extremely generous to "higher ups".
As a result of Solzhenitsyn's portrayal of the camp being so terrible as well as Shukhov's calm methodical explanations the reader begins to believe that some of the acts commonly associated with criminals (such as: swindling, smuggling, networking through bribery) may have actually been taught as a means of survival from within the camp. Thus Solzhenitsyn succeeds in his attack; showing the people that Stalin has created these camps to "rehabilitate" criminals while benefiting the community, but in fact is slowly killing them off or otherwise refining them into perfect conmen and sneaks. All of Solzhenitsyn's messag
All papers and essays are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright 2002-2009
Direct Essays , LLC. All Rights Reserved. DMCA Webmasters make $$$$