erminally ill" and in the end a mistake in the diagnosis is discovered then the suffering and blame would not fall on technology but on society itself. Suffering is surely a terrible thing and society has a clear duty to comfort those in need and to ease their suffering when it can. But suffering is also a natural part of life with values for the individual and for others that we should not overlook. Knowing that a life can be taken at any time will incline people to give up too easily, hence seeking an escape in euthanasia. Killing a human being is not justified under any circumstances, which is why euthanasia should no longer be in practice. Although many countries around the world accept assisted suicide as part of their social norm, the fact remains that any type of murder is illegal in most societies. The American case of "It's over Debbie", in which a gynecology resident gave a lethal injection of morphine to a woman with ovarian cancer, questions the legality of any doctor's intents and actions. First, the resident appears to have committed a felony: premeditated murder. Direct intentional homicide is a felony in all American jurisdictions, for which a plea of merciful motive is no excuse. Second, law aside, the physician behaved altogether in a scandalously unprofessional and unethical manner contrary to the policy of the American Medical Association. He did not know the patient: he had never seen her or her family, he did not study her chart, and he did not converse with her or her physician. He took, as an unambiguous command, her only words to him, "Let's get this over with." Instead of thinking of ways in which he could ease her suffering, he brought her death. This is no humane and thoughtful physician succumbing with fear and trembling to the pressures and wishes of a patient, for which there was truly no other recourse. "This is an impulsive yet cold technician, arrogantly masquerading as a knight of compassion and humanity" who should be punished for his actions. When a patient asks for assistance in dying, and the doctor then gives the patient a lethal injection, there is no way of disguising what is happening. The doctor's intention is clear, this is undoubtedly a killing and not an allowing to die. An essential aspect of euthanasia is that it involves taking a human life of a person who is suffering from some disease of injury from which recovery cannot reasonably be expected. The action is deliberate and intentional as stated in section 231(2) of the Canadian Criminal Code: Murder is first degree when it is planned and deliberate. Section 222(1) of the Criminal Code states: A person commits homicide when, directly or indirectly, by any means, he causes the death of a human being. Therefore, when a doctor injects a lethal injection he is doing so deliberately with the intention to cause death to his patient. Nowhere in the Criminal Code does it state that one can use a merciful plea as a defense for murder. People like Dr. Kevorkian of Michigan, who continue masquerading as "helpful god" to assist terminally ill patient in death, should be incarcerated for breaking the law. If society allows one or two or three p

Some common words found in the essay are:
Jivov E-mail, John Stevas, Paul II, Kevorkian Michigan, Charter Rights, Thomas Acquinas, Let's Instead, It's Debbie, Criminal Code, Life Death, human life, assisted suicide, ease suffering, taking human life, taking human, criminal code, lethal injection, people assist suicide, natural goal, doctors nurses, euthanasia society, free choice, suffering calls people, answered yes question,
Approximate Word count = 2126
Approximate Pages = 9 (250 words per page double spaced)