Now does the death penalty truly deter crimes and murder? This question is in the center of a big political controversy over this topic. Some people oppose the death penalty because of the many people on death row today. Statistics also state that states with capital punishment have a higher crime rate then those that do not. Therefore, it is not an effective penalty, it is ineffective and a waist of our hard earned tax dollars. This process costs between 500,000 to 1,000,000 dollars annually. I have to say that the states that have capital punishment are usually urbanized areas that have high crime rates because of the enormous population. Rather, in rural states there is no need for the death penalty because everyone is scattered around and the population is not as big.

Abolitionists explain that capital punishment is a racist penalty. They say it is only

I still have to say that the death penalty is the most effective means of crime deterrent as you can see. It not only punishes those who commit these crimes, but also prevents future crimes by striking terror in the would-be murderer's mind with the consequences he would have to face for his actions. It has been proven to be effective throughout history, as long as people keep committing crimes; I don't think it will ever cease being around.

Throughout history people have been put to death for various forms of wrongdoing. Methods of execution have included such practices such as crucifixion, stoning, burning at the stake, shooting, drowning, hanging, chopping of their heads and impaling. Today's capital punishment is typically accomplished by lethal gas, injection, and electrocution, hanging or shooting. Other harsh, physical forms of this punishment were referred to as corporal punishment they have all been eliminated in modern times as uncivilized and unnecessary. About 80 nations have abolished slavery and about the same number of nations retain it.

If there is no capital punishment, there will not be any consequences to threaten these sick people, and people that continue committing vicious crimes. They will continue the evil and the righteous will go after them and this world would become a total chaos. Even though some say that as long as a state keeps killing, we are sending a message that killing is a way to solve problems. I personally say that capital punishment is correct in the sense that it is a last resort. We must fight " fire with fire". We will never have a perfect society because; there will always be some kind of evil. The best we can do is "put our foot down to evil".

With a good lawyer anyone who is sentenced to life or death can depend more on their lawyer than on a crime. This statement stands true on various examples; the O.J Simpson Trial, and the "Unabomber" killed so many people and he is still living after they have proof that he one of the killers. Other murderers have killed only 1 and are put to death immediately, without question. It is wrong to have these killers laugh in the face of society just because they have a good lawyer that knows how to manipulate the system. It is bad to see this happen because justice never gets served. If they kill people and plan the killing there should be no question about it, no lawyer, nothing whatsoe

Some common words found in the essay are:
University Survey, Capital Punishment, Fay Tucker, Trial Unabomber, Supreme Court, capital punishment, death penalty, people death, mentally retarded, people death row, death row, killed people, throughout history people, sentenced death, life death, retarded people, decision die, mentally retarded people,
Approximate Word count = 1611
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)