I think it can happen, although there are very few people that have done it. There is still many years to come yet so people still have their chance to change from wars and violence to means of peace to obtain political change. If people would compromise instead of using violence we wouldn't have to fight to death and we would actually have more people alive today.

Mikhail Gorbachev was one person who sought to reform society by introducing perestroika (restructuring of the economy in the former USSR) and glasnost (openness in polit

In present times there are still many wars going on to obtain political change but if people could use diplomatic negotiations, or negotiate between leaders then we could obtain political change by peace. This would occur over time so there would be less chance for reactionary ideas.

Therefore if one person can obtain political change without the use of bloodshed and force I think everyone else should be able to. In order to establish political change in the French and Russian Revolutions bloodshed and force were used. In the Russian Revolution the country wanted to go to Communism from Tsar, and in this bloodshed and force was used and there were many lives lost. In the French Revolution the country didn't want to be controlled by the King but by democratic means, also bloodshed and force was used and many lives

Some common words found in the essay are:
French Revolution, Russian Revolutions, Soviet Union, Europe Soviet, Mikhail Gorbachev, Ronald Reagan, Peace Prize, John Paul, George Bush, political change, Gorbachev Using, bloodshed force, obtain political change, obtain political, french russian revolutions, french russian, russian revolutions, bloodshed force lives, change people, george bush, lives lost, force lives, force lives lost, revolution country, political change french,
Approximate Word count = 555
Approximate Pages = 2 (250 words per page double spaced)