There are some differences in Aristotle's conception of happiness when compared with a subjective theory of happiness. It is granted that Aristotelian conception of happiness and the subjective theory of happiness say that everyone has certain standards to fulfill throughout their lives and as a result, these individuals attempt to reach those goals in order to li

The subjectivists oppose to Aristotle's conception of happiness by stating that people do not have to live the best life in order to be happy even if an individual reaches his standards that he inflicts on his life. Aristotle argues that just because a person has met his values in life does not mean that they are actually leading a happy life. According to Aristotle, an individual must seek "justice, courage, and self control" before they can reach eudaimonia which it simply means living the best life an individual is capable of.

Kraut does not agree with the Extreme Subjectivism" that the person who was deceived is leading a happy life. In the case of the young boy, an Extreme Subjectivism's" would say that he had set the standards which states that he did not want to have "false friends", because that notion would make him happy. The "Extreme Subjectivism" says that the deceived boy felt happy not knowing that he is living an illusion, but he is still not leading a happy life because he is being deceived.

To better understand the "Extreme Subjectivism" Kraut came up with a

Some common words found in the essay are:
Richard Kraut, Extreme Subjectivism, Subjectivism Kraut, According Aristotle, happy life, Extreme Subjectivism's, leading happy life, leading happy, extreme subjectivism, conception happiness, feeling happy, Conception Happiness, false friends, aristotle's conception, reality illusion, individual's happiness, illusion leading happy, happiness psychological, happy leading happy, subjective theory happiness, feeling happy leading,
Approximate Word count = 736
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)