The Control of Terrorism
Within culture throughout time, individuals have been different from one another, and in several ways. Appearance, actions, and even thought are some of these differentiating characteristics. One's thoughts do not necessarily have to conform to another's. Yet when given power, an individual may enforce his beliefs on to a large group of people, stripping the right of free thought from these in question. The most famous example of this being the reign of power established by Adolf Hitler and the Nazis. However, there are those who call themselves revolutionaries; those who disregard the norm, taking no account to the rules that are laid before them. Yet sometimes their struggle for their own personal rights goes unheard. Then comes the time when they must make themselves heard, and wake people up to their truth. The most common end result: terrorism.By now, governments throughout the world are realizing that terrorism is a serious threat to be dealt with. The growing terrorist population is becoming more and more dangerous, with new organizations forming out of nothing. But not only has this population merely grown; it has diffused into the cracks of our society we deemed immune to such violent acts. Places such as schools, buses
The tactics that U.S. terrorists have grown accustomed to vary from group to group. One of the most common devices used today has been car bombs. The advantages of this weapon are the mobility, relative low-cost, and also the low profile. However, as of late, the U.S. government has grown wise to this weapon, and has made strides in order to correct it such as moving parking lots away from commercial or state legislature buildings. Though this has had some effect, again, it has not done much to help the general terrorist population. The kinds of people that usually partake in political terrorism do not typically operate single-handedly. They classically belong to terrorist groups or organizations such as the Black September organization of Palestine headed by Yassir Arafat or the Japanese Red Army led by Keihin Ampo Kyoto. The two main reasons for this "safety in numbers" philosophy are: protection (law enforcement and government threats or actions) and funding (weapons, shelter, food, etc.). In the terrorist's minds, these are the two main "predators" and are potentially devastating to one's future. Terrorism is a dangerous and very expensive "profession" and requires the necessities described above. There are two approaches being taken in an effort to stop political terrorism today, both on opposite sides of the solution spectrum. The first and most common is simply imprisoning those that commit the crimes. If such a perpetrator is captured, typically they will serve a short prison term and then is returned to the world with parole. It is said that a political terrorist receives no better or no worse treatment than ordinary prisoners. However, this unspoken rule is argued from both sides. Some say that political terrorists are treated too lenient for such violent crimes. These same people argue that political terrorists can get away with bombing and/or killing anyone or anything as long as they have a sliver of justification for their acts. Others argue that these criminals are treated far too unjustly and with poorer living conditions when under imprisonment. These people say that because a political terrorist's actions characteristically try to defy the foundations of the government they are under, that they receive lengthened sentences from the court due to a feeling of personal injustice. Either way, these people often speak their minds in forms such as strikes, protests, and even riots. The problem that exists in trying to stop this particular form of terrorism is the fact that the organizations involved typically have mass followers, a good number of them being extremely dangerous. Most would not hesitate to show violence to those that resist to their beliefs. Also, the funding that these groups have is tremendous and can often have the power to bribe or corrupt the public officials that aim to shut them down. Therefore, prevention of social terrorism does not seem to be in the near future. However, this type of terrorism is not considered a growing threat in the world today. The instances in which it is used are only in cases where there are no other alternatives and occurrences are few and far between. Therefore, although eco-terrorism is always a viable option to terrorists, the government does not feel the need to direct much attention to the matter. Yet this "hands-off" approach could later prove to be disastrous as eco-terrorism is capable of a large amount of damage.
Some common words found in the essay are:
Americans Jews, Ampo Kyoto, Forces SWAT, Hitler Nazis, Middle East, Oklahoma City, Cyprus Nearly, Hitler April, Nelson Mandela, Dylan Klebold, type terrorism, political terrorism, form terrorism, throughout world, law enforcement, growing threat, terrorism form, middle east, social terrorism, people argue, countries middle east, japanese red army,
Approximate Word count = 2664
Approximate Pages = 11 (250 words per page double spaced)
|