Not Violating Copyrights

Going to be a Useful Tool for Musicians in the Future

Copyright infringement has quickly become one of the most talked about issues of the internet. The most difficult aspect is

defining its boundaries and pinpointing its limits. The distribution of music via Napster is a perfect example of a controversial

issue that has sprouted due to copyright questions. Technically, Napster is not violating any copyright laws. Although it may

appear as if Napster is distributing and illegally copying music, in actuality Napster is merely a server/database in which

users have access to categorized MP3 files. Napster is also free. Copyright infringement is present only when the users

illegally copy and distribute music files not merely the presence of a server. This paper takes the standpoint that Napster is

going to be an extremely useful tool to the music industry in the future. Although it currently appears that these two groups

are at entirely opposite ends, the solution to the problem is defining guidelines that will benefit both sides.

Napster is undercutting their business and they are trying to combat this attack by suing Napster. This is a rather drastic

like any other entrepreneur, they are trying to make a profit from their hard work. Napster has shocked the music industry

however, should not be legally prosecuted for copyright infringement. Napster has a clearly laid out copyright policy that

Although Napster has attempted to protect itself from lawsuits through the use of their copyright policy, there are still many

free, it allows these artists to distribute their music with little or no cost. The convenience of Napster is also impressive by

dispersion of music over a legal system. Napster is a tool that is full of opportunities that can enhance the music industry and

the potential to be extremely beneficial to all parties involved. The major obstacles hindering the success of Napster are the

concerns about the piracy of copyrighted music being transacted through the system. This has caused a series of lawsuits

Some common words found in the essay are:
Basically Napster, Dr Dre, Napster Mp3com, Napster Bertlesmann, Technically Napster, Bertlesmann German, Future Copyright, America RIAA, music industry, America Napster, Cary Sherman, copyright infringement, copyright laws, recording companies, copyright policy, napster violating, sharing music, nov 1 2000, napster software, nov 1, recording industry association, held responsible, violating copyright laws, metallica dr dre, napster violating copyright,
Approximate Word count = 1476
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)