The Compatibility of Faith and
The Compatibility of Faith and Reason When comparing the two selections by W.K. Clifford and William James on the compatibility of faith and reason, I feel that both arguments make very valid points. However I do think, after careful reading and based on my own experience, that William James has the stronger argument. William James’ “The Will to Believe” claims that “Our passional nature not only lawfully may, but must, decide an option between propositions, whenever it is a genuine option that cannot by it’s nature be decided on intellectual grounds.” James’ contention is that under certain circumstances, it is perfectly “legal” for a person to go ahead and believe something for which scientific evidence is lacking. To do so is not unreasonable. This argument makes itself useful in the religious hypothesis for the existence of God. James, himself, believed that there is a Greater Consciousness than that of human beings to which we are connected. Among other things, this Greater Consciousness cares about and preserves many of the things that we hold dear to us like love, truth, and justice. This is done so that the values possessed by these things continue to exist in the world rather than perishing with us when we die.
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Ratio Pope, According Clifford, God James, Ethics Belief, James Believe, According James, William James, Faith Reason, religious beliefs, william james, faith reason, Reflections Fides, god james, gods existence, belief god, existence god, scientific evidence, Encyclical Fides, william james believe, suspend belief, evidence truth, god james believed, enlightened trust testimony, fides et ratio, suspend belief god,
Approximate Word count = 1310
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
 |
