99,000 Essays & Term Papers: Where You Buy Essays and Papers Online
Direct Essays, Where You Can Buy Essays and Papers Online

Instant Access to Buy Essays and Papers Online!
Acceptable Use Policy
Customer Service
Site Search


Login to View Essays and Papers Online

Join Now - Instant Access to Essays and Research Papers!

  Essay and Research Paper Topics
Acceptance Essays
Arts Essays
Custom Essays
English Literature Essays
Foreign
History Essays
Miscellaneous Research Papers and Essays
Movie Essays and Papers
Music Term Papers
Novels
People and Biography Research Papers
Politics Research Papers
Religion Research Papers
Science Essay Topics
Sports Research Papers
Technology Research Papers
 
  FAQ
Technical Support
Site Map
Direct Essays
 

 



Welcome to Direct Essays

This is a short summary of this paper!

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!


Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900
Special! View this paper for FREE!
  

WHITLAM

Was the Governor General right to argue that he had the constitutional authority

to dismiss the Whitlam Government or was Whitlam correct in arguing that the

principle of responsible government should prevail?

On the 11th November 1975, the Australian Governor General, Sir John Kerr,

dismissed the federal Government of Gough Whitlam and commissioned

Opposition Leader Malcolm Fraser as Prime Minister. The dismissal and the

events leading to it clearly demonstrated the friction between constitutional

authority and responsible government. In a spiral of events, responsible

government and the overall concept of democracy was blatantly ignored, and

technicalities within the constitution abused, leading to the dismissal of a

democratically elected Prime Minister. While the Governor General's decision

was constitutionally allowed, it was certainly not the responsible or democratic

Despite their victory in the double-dissolution election of 1974, the Labor Party

found themselves once again without a majority in the Senate, deadlocked with

the Liberal/National coalition at 29 seats each, with 2 going to the

independents.1 They received a further blow with the death of one Labor


confidence was needed from both houses of parliament and since they didn't

situation. Had he been given warning it may have changed Whitlam's own

between written and unwritten constitution was starting to take effect. As a

Constitutionally this was possible since the Constitution did not explicitly state

results that are against the democracy it stands for, as was the case in the

protect states' interests or if it objects to the contents of the bill. However in this

from the major banks to pay for Government expenses. This certainly



Some common words found in the essay are:
Prime Minister, Constitutionally Constitution, Liberal Senators, Malcolm Fraser, Justice Barwick, Government Senate, Governor Generals, Constitution Senators, Law Office, Whitlam Government, responsible government, prime minister, supply bill, whitlam government, supply whitlam, malcolm fraser, chief justice, obtain supply, unwritten constitution, supply bills, responsible government governor, senate block supply, opposition leader malcolm, chief justice barwick, leader malcolm fraser,
Approximate Word count = 1324
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)


  

More Essays on WHITLAM

Whitlam Dismissal678 words
How effective was Whitlam537 words
The development of Second Wave Feminism in Australia2929 words
History of Australia459 words
Austrailian Civilization3503 words

Look at even more essays on WHITLAM
More Politics Essays

Special! View this paper for FREE!
Click here to JoinNow!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check
Click here to Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900

 

All papers and essays are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright 2002-2009 Direct Essays , LLC. All Rights Reserved. DMCA
Webmasters make $$$$
Saved Papers