WHITLAM
Was the Governor General right to argue that he had the constitutional authorityto dismiss the Whitlam Government or was Whitlam correct in arguing that the principle of responsible government should prevail? On the 11th November 1975, the Australian Governor General, Sir John Kerr, dismissed the federal Government of Gough Whitlam and commissioned Opposition Leader Malcolm Fraser as Prime Minister. The dismissal and the events leading to it clearly demonstrated the friction between constitutional authority and responsible government. In a spiral of events, responsible government and the overall concept of democracy was blatantly ignored, and technicalities within the constitution abused, leading to the dismissal of a democratically elected Prime Minister. While the Governor General’s decision was constitutionally allowed, it was certainly not the responsible or democratic Despite their victory in the double-dissolution election of 1974, the Labor Party found themselves once again without a majority in the Senate, deadlocked with the Liberal/National coalition at 29 seats each, with 2 going to the independents.1 They received a further blow with the death of one Labor
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Prime Minister, Governor Generals, Constitutionally Constitution, Liberal Senators, Malcolm Fraser, Justice Barwick, Government Senate, Constitution Senators, Law Office, Whitlam Government, responsible government, prime minister, supply bill, whitlam government, malcolm fraser, supply whitlam, obtain supply, supply bills, governor generals, unwritten constitution, chief justice barwick, opposition leader malcolm, sir john kerr, leader malcolm fraser, written unwritten constitution,
Approximate Word count = 1324
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
|