The Eyes Of An Author
As a comparison of both content and the corresponding ways in which both Davis and McNeil fit within the historical paradigm °Liberalism versus Political Economy± this paper will examine both the viewpoint from which each author writes from, and also build a critical analysis using a common theme from both °something new under the sun,± and °Let Victorian Holocausts.± The common theme from each book to be examined will be °Water± and how water has been exploited by both Liberalistic governments and to exactly the same extent by governments based on Marxism. McNeil¯s chapter six and Davis¯s chapter seven will represent the focal points of this paper. Water exploitation in various forms has been crucial in the rise of Western society. It is with this key point in mind that this comparison and corresponding critical analysis will be written. There can be little doubt that the environment has been a critical part of both Liberal history and Political Economy. It is also true that both McNeil and Davis have recognized the political gains available to those with control over the environment. Certainly each author makes the argument that the governments most adept at this environmental exploitation will be the government with th
As the almost perfect contrast to Davis we see the Neo-Liberalistic approach taken by McNeil in his writing of °something new under the sun.± McNeil includes that very matter of fact, sort °what are we going to do about it anyway± approach to his book. He looks at the earth¯s resource and in this case water, as something you either able to exploit or your not. If by chance you can or did exploit it than perhaps it is for that reason that you Liberal or the Marxist deserve to gain from that exploitation. It is this sort of Linear approach to his writing that serves to best demonstrate just how completely Liberal Davis is. There is really no defined unifying theme is this book, only broad topics from which the rise of the West is certainly implied. Where as in the Davis¯s book the scientific aspects unify the book and help him to write from the Political Economy standpoint. Food for thought, imagine for a moment taking the McNeil viewpoint and then applying it to the Davis subject material. Now ask yourself did the British really do what McNeil said they did? Or is what they did from the Liberalistic approach just another historical representation of how elitism is the way the world work and that just how is. The strong will always exploit the weak and the rich will get richer, the wealth of a few is the wealth of all. Through this scenario we can see the complete and utter separation between Davis and McNeil. In summary, Davis writes of a compelling story about exploitation of India by the Imperialistic British Crown. He tells of market fixing, drought, famine, class struggle, water depletion, and social struggle, all from the eyes of a political economist. The contrast within the paradigm is so great when comparing these two writers, that the second you look at Davis¯s story through McNeil¯s eyes, it did not happen. e most influence over not only the people within it own borders, but over people in other countries, which governments look to influence. The fundamental differences in the ways that both Davis, and McNeil explore this exploitation, is severe. Throughout the book we see Davis lo
Some common words found in the essay are:
Political Economy, Soviet Union, British Utilitarian, Marxism McNeil¯s, McNeil Davis, British Crown, Davis Neo-Liberalistic, Davis McNeil, El Nino, Imperialistic British, political economy, liberalistic approach, davis writes, davis mcneil, el nino, writes standpoint political, °something sun±, theme book, common theme, liberal approach, throughout book, davis writes standpoint, standpoint political economy,
Approximate Word count = 1435
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
