The Catcher in the Rye
Banning or censoring books violate the American Bill of Rights. Freedom ofspeech is a way that people express themselves. If the author wanted changes to be made to their book, they would have wrote it differently. The Catcher in the Rye is Holdens flashback of a two-day period from a sanitarium in California. If The Catcher in the Rye was censored you couldn't get the full affect and that would be a shame. If it was banned students would be missing out on an enlightening and inspiring novel. Students and their parents should be the ones to individually decide if they should read something or not. The words "goddam" and "chrissake" may not be appropriate; however, without them you wouldn't be able to understand the mount of anger and resentment in Holdens Life. These words are extreme ways of showing an immense amount of hate or
that it is correct. People think by banning this novel and others like it will show a zero everywhere. Salinger should be praised for his superb writing, not criticized for his "goddam" and "chrissake." These words are more powerful and leave a longer lasting Maybe back in the 1950's swear words and obscenity was shocking to people, but bitter young man. The only beauty he sees in life comes from his little sister Phoebe. parts we should be paying attention to. These issues are the most important. Teachers, teenagers. The Catcher in the Rye has some many great themes; death, innocence, and
Some common words found in the essay are:
Catcher Rye, Teachers Students, Parents Faculty, Pencey Prep, Holdens Life, Rights Freedom, Rye Holdens, catcher rye, Rye Banning, themes book, goddam chrissake, students parents,
Approximate Word count = 597
Approximate Pages = 2 (250 words per page double spaced)
|