Animal cruelty
One of the most touchy aspects of our relationship with animals is the use of animals in laboratory sciences. Some manufactures of cosmetics and household products still conduct painful and useless tests on live animals, even though no law requires them not to. Some people, called anti-vivisectionists, are at one extreme in their concern. They want an abolition of all experiments on live animals. At the other extreme there are those who say that it is quite all right for us to do whatever we like to animals. They say that God gave us such a right, since it is written in the bible (Genesis 1:26) that man has dominion over all creatures. If these tests give some educational value, adds to scientific knowledge, or can help improve human health, they argue that it is worth killing animals or subjecting them to painful experiments. I believe that the unnecessary testing of animals is inhumane and unethical when alternative methods The anti-vivisectionists say we should not allow experiments on animals and the animal utilitarians, or vivisectionists, claim that we can do anything to animals if i
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Animal Cruelty, Drug Administration, Percent L50, Designs Technical, Gil Langley, Safety Commission, Agarose Diffusion-Tiny, Estee Lauder, Assay- Irritants, Eye-Irritancy Test, animal tests, draize test, cosmetics household products, animal testing, household products, cosmetics household, product safety, neutral red, human eyes, eye irritancy, human cells, perfectly healthy animals, piece lipstick eye, consumer product safety, safety cosmetics household,
Approximate Word count = 2212
Approximate Pages = 9 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
 |
