them for murdering two people, but rather how the justice system murdered two people and got

away with it. Throughout the trial the public withdrew from their anti-radical thinking to more of

a sympathetic understanding of another human being, no matter their beliefs. World-wide interest

was quickly turned to the ill-fated Sacco and Vanzetti. While the judge and prosecution had

already delivered the verdict in their minds, Sacco and Vanzetti proclaimed and defended their

Before the crime ever took place Sacco worked at the Milford Shoe Factory as an edge

trimmer. Sacco was a hard worker; who supported his wife, Rosa, and his son, Dante. Vanzetti

worked as a fish peddler. In May 1917, both left their jos to go to Mexico and avoid the draft.

Both Sacco and Vanzetti had the same views which were considered radical at the time; therefore

they did not advertise them. Understandably, they feared for their safety as well as their friends

and families who shared the same ideals (Feuerlicht 11). Although some had suspected that they

were of radical ideology, it was not publicaly announced. Having

Vanzetti returned from Mexico. Upon their return, organizations and federal agents started to

Sacco and Vanzetti were innocent men, who were martyred. They were not killed because

in Dedham Jail was given the financial report of the Sacco and Vanzetti case to read, he read it

the defendants. Sacco's alibi rested on his repeated attempt to get passports to Italy to see his

Some common words found in the essay are:
Sacco Vanzetti, Nicola Sacco, Braintree Crimes, Bartolomeo Vanzetti, Sacco Vanzetti's, Italians Feuerlight, Warden Henry, Madeiros Russell, Judge Thayer, Law Professor, sacco vanzetti, sacco vanzetti's, murder robbery, braintree crimes, judge thayer, nicola sacco, draft sacco vanzetti, crime sacco, altman 70, august 23, pronounced dead, guilty murder robbery, august 23 1927,
Approximate Word count = 1337
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)