After hearing, the case the jurors go into deliberations. Eleven of the 12 are convinced that the boy murdered his father. However, Juror # 8 a caring man, who wishes to talk about why the other jurors think that the boy is guilty, clashes with Juror # 3, a sadistic man who would pull the switch

himself to end the boys life. Early on, it's not revealed why #3 feels so strongly about putting the boy to death. He is just so dead set on killing him though. But because of Juror # 8, the others must now go over the whole case again to review the facts.

According to Rose, several elements can influence a jury's verdict, s

facts but some do not, they just judge the person on looks or how that person feels.

In the end, #3 gives in after all the jurors have changed their guilty votes to not guilty, because of # 8. He is left behind. His hatred of the boy revealed because of his similar experiences with his own son. This story shows how close the boy came to death, and if the jurors did not review the evidence, he would have just been killed. It rather teaches the lesson of not jumping to conclusions and reviewing facts thoroughly before acting on vague ones. It really taught me that lesson

uch as the emotional make-up of individual jurors. Many elements can change a jurors decision. Juror #3, who is convinced that the boy is guilty, and is allied with Juror#4, who is eventually convi

Some common words found in the essay are:
According Rose, Reginald Rose, , boy guilty, votes guilty, juror #, # 8, juror # 8, boy death, boy die, juror #3, pull switch, convinced boy, emotional make-up,
Approximate Word count = 520
Approximate Pages = 2 (250 words per page double spaced)