lsfvh
The Internet provides many different types of information on virtually any topic possible. There are many components that make up the Internet besides text. Software that is available on the Internet is ever-changing and is rapidly growing. Napster is a software company located in California, that distributes music, to users all over the world. Napster is among the many programs that enables you to "share" audio files with people all over the world on the Internet. The controversial topic is, where do you cross the line between sharing and stealing? Many people believe that Napster should be banned permanently because it violates numerous copyright laws and many major company labels should be paid for there losses. There are also some people that think Napster should be allowed because it isn't really considered to be stealing if someone gives you the music for free. This issue has intensified over the past 6 months, and now there is a legal debate to determine Napster's fate on the Internet. The co-owner of Napster is Shawn Fanning. At a young age of 19 years old, Fanning designed Napster as a freshman at Northeastern Universit
Napster does not duplicate illegal music, it just allows it to be shared freely. How can a company be responsible for pirated music, if it never actually broke a copyright law. The RIAA does however suggest that the majority of the music being swapped may be pirated, but is a suggestion enough to shut down the company? A possibility is not definite, and I feel that there is no actually way of knowing how much illegal and legal music is being swapped daily. "As a business Napster technically doesn't make any copies of the music. Why then should Napster be held liable-if xerox isn't-when an individual uses one of the companies machines to copy and distribute protected material"( ). Laws such as copyright infringement, have been reviewed in court and accusations were made that Napster was encouraging the distribution of stolen music over the Internet. It looks as though the case could go either way at this moment in time. The ending results could be devastating to the music industries, there is always the possibility of a backlash from music lovers all over the world. An online survey, off of www.aj.com, showed that almost 90 percent of people using Napster would boycott and not buy a CD again, if it were to lose the lawsuit. Recording companies should reevaluate and decided weather or not it is worth getting rid of this software. If used properly it could be very profitable for these corporations as well as the artists. eghbjkl;enrl"bnlqejnblen bqegbnenbkbvdvksbvkgbdegh Technology can not be stopped or even slowed down in some cases. This trial has a huge impact on the future of the m
Some common words found in the essay are:
Internet Napster, Survival Internet, Corp Napster, API Bible, Fanning Robin, America Online, Internet Freenet, Gnutella Napster-like, Initiative SDMI, Audio Layer, free music, lose lawsuit, programs enables, controversial topic, music industries, music napster, software programs, music files, recording industry, music companies,
Approximate Word count = 1082
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
