In response to pressure from society, We should stop and think before allowed scientists to go on without strict controls. All the attention these days to concerns about human cloning has pushed other controversial areas of medical science into shadows. The first attempts are to carry out genetic enhancement in humans could soon be under way. The goal of genetic

Although we belief that The therapy aims to overcome health problems by giving the effected individuals the normal- or functioning- gene. Allowing genetic enhancement in more than a few very special cases poses real problems. First, the risks to the patient at present are very great compared with the possible benefits. We sill know very little about how they act- a single gene can have multiple effects in different parts of the body. Moreover, genes do not act alone: the ire effects are amplified, demitted, or counterbalanced by others genes in ways that we do not understand. We might be willing to expose a patient to great risks to treat grave disease. Subjecting someone risk is ethically unacceptable if the person seeking treatment is healthy.

Instead, we need to decide what enhancements we consider unacceptable, and to prevent their use. A helpful model is the moratorium that scientists imposed on themselves in the early 197's, when they had just discovered how to manipulate genetic material trough recombinant DNA techniques.

Some common words found in the essay are:
, genetic enhancement, decide enhancements consider, enhancements consider unacceptable, decide enhancements, consider unacceptable prevent, genetically enhanced, enhancements consider, dna techniques, consider unacceptable, unacceptable prevent, genetic material,
Approximate Word count = 698
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)