If the justification for donating an organ is charity, then it seems ethically contradictory that one could sell his/her organs. The anatomical integrity of a human body is nearly perfect and should be sacrificed only for the highest of motives, which dose not include financial gains. Moreover, imagine the moral chaos that will ensue if organs were sold to the highest bidder. A person in dire poverty may need the money that would come

In conclusion, technology has created a problem that did not exist twenty years ago and hopefully will not exist twenty years from now. Currently society is forced to deal with the reality that people will die because there are not enough organs to save everyone. The scarcity of organs for transplant makes them a valuable and precious item. One possible solution to the debate is to genetically engineer specific organs from embryo cells, but not engineer the humans themselves. Although this practice may or may not be possible, this would solve all the potential ethical problems that would arise from the human aspects of cloning and seems to be a more ethical solution to organ transplantation than the selling of organs. In effect, this prevents human organs from becoming a commodity, which I believe to be unethical because it is contrary to the dignity of the human body/person entity, and if organs were available for purchase, mainly the wealthy population would truly benefit from organ transplant.

from an organ donation to support his family. Sadly, society's inability to help him find better ways to support his family may actually force him to sell something that cannot be replaced. While, some argue that since people are paid for their blood, they should

Some common words found in the essay are:
, human organs, paid blood, people paid blood, human life, cloning humans, support family, people paid, organs available, donating organ, exist twenty, organ transplant,
Approximate Word count = 857
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)