"The Warren Commission consisted of seven men chosen to investigate the assassinatio

A new team was made to investigate this part of the assassination and concluded, "There is a "95% probability that a fourth shot was fired from the grassy knoll."(Livingstone, p 260) New information that has been found reveals that, "The throat wound on John F. Kennedy was probed."(Stahl, part III, B) This proves that the autopsy doctors were lying when they said they weren't aware of the throat wound. "The back wound was also lower than the throat wound, which destroys the single-bullet theory. Another forensic pathologist concluded that the head wound was actually four inches lower than previously recorded."(Stahl, part IV, B) If Oswald was the lone gunman, JFK's head had to have been tilted down and this is not evident in either of the videos of the killing. "New reports have also surfaced from witnesses who have seen autopsy reports that showed a wound in the back of the head."(Posner, 49) This tells us that there are in fact two sets of autopsies, one that shows wound in the back of the head and one that doesn't. Doctors must have tampered with a set of the autopsies in order to follow the lone gunman theory. There is no way of knowing this because the government would never admit it. They knew that the wound in the back of the head would challenge this theory and something had to be done about it, so they changed the autopsy reports to make it look like there weren't as many wounds and that a single bullet in fact killed the President. The reasons for the government's actions may never be known, but we can speculate that they chose to tamper with evidence in order to prevent problems after the assassination. If it was a conspiracy and the people learned that the government was trying to cover it up, it's possible that our government would not be what it is today.

Posner, Gerald. "Cracks in the Wall of Silence." Newsweek. Oct 12, 1998: p 49.

http://www.webcom.com/~lpease/collections/assassinations/jfk/icebulls.htm

"Basic Evidence of Conspiracy in the Kennedy Assassination."

Reading this paper, one would think that this information may be true, but it can all be rebutted. Yes, there are different sides to every story, but there is too much evidence telling us that there was more than that one person involved in the assassination. It is up to you to choose whatever you think, but no matter which side you choose, you must understand that the government has already been caught in lies. If Oswald did kill Kennedy by himself, why are there so many cover-ups and so many contradictions? We probably will never know the real story of the Kennedy assassination, because if the government were involved in the conspiracy, they would never admit what they have done wrong.

Some common words found in the essay are:
IV Oswald, JJ Humes, John Kennedy, CIA Recently, John Connally, Warren Commission, Oliver Stone, Federal Troops, Warren Commission's, Harvey Oswald, john kennedy, warren commission, throat wound, single bullet, assassination john kennedy, american people, base neck, assassination john, harvey oswald, kennedy assassination, oil companies, lee harvey oswald, 1998 grunwald lisa, grunwald lisa care, lisa care life,
Approximate Word count = 2046
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page double spaced)