"In Whren v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the true motivation of police officers in making traffic stops was irrelevant as long as they had probable cause to believe that a traffic law had been broken (211)."

justified and neither violated the rights of the suspects. Fitting the description of suspects and being in the general vicinity of the crime is adequate evidence to pull a vehicle over and check out the situation. The second stop was made because the driver had violated a traffic code. Since the vehicle is breaking this law the police have the right to pull over that vehicle. The officers even took the vehicle to the station to obtain a search warrant when the suspect objected. Both stops were done in a legal manner.

If the suspects in the white Toyota Camry had been advised of their Miranda rights before the search of their vehicle then the police would have had to obtain a search warrant. But by denying the police the right to search your vehicle is almost implying guilt in its

Some common words found in the essay are:
Toyota Camry, Supreme Court, Carroll United, Reason Search, search vehicle, white toyota camry, toyota camry, pull vehicle, search warrant, white toyota, advised miranda rights, obtain search warrant, advised miranda, officer search, rights suspects, obtain search, miranda rights,
Approximate Word count = 534
Approximate Pages = 2 (250 words per page double spaced)