one is overwhelmed with news of arrests, murders, homicides, serial killers, and

other serious crimes. It is rare not to go through a day in this world

and not hear of these things. Still, some government officials in our country seem a bit uncertain about what steps to take in order to minimize the actions of serious or potential offenders. Not only is it committing a crime, but also today, it is ending ones life, either physically or in a prison cell. This is a risk one is taking when he decides to stab someone with a knife or pull a trigger, but is it really up to our justice system to decide one's fate?

There are many issues that address this question of capital punishment such as

religion, the effect on society, restitution being denied, the possible "wrongly

accused", and the rights of the convicted. But how often do these concepts creep

then why not chop off the thief's hand? "An eye for an eye" was the justice of

nto the publics mind when it hears of our "fair and trusty" government taking

Some people think that restitution is granted when one is sentenced to the death penalty. However, if a loved one is murdered and his family feels justice in

he have to serve the time that's not rightfully his and take the needle that

Forgiving and forgetting are entirely out of the question, but one should

If solving corruption with immorality is the world's remedy for reconciliation,

away someone's breathing rights? The bible states, "Thou shall not kill," and this being a sin should have to be corrected within oneself. On the other hand, it also states, "Don't judge others personal convictions." It is a government's responsibility to punish people that disobey the law to keep the world in order, but is it their right to take their lives away? It is a Christian'

Some common words found in the essay are:
, Abraham Lincoln, capital punishment, death penalty, justice system,
Approximate Word count = 638
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)