Critique On School to Work Programs

A detailed Summary of Critique On School to Work Programs

On September 4, 1997, Phyllis Schlafly wrote an article titled "School-to-Work Will Train, Not Educate." The article discusses the cons of the school-to-work program and that states that it is portrayed as a "cradle to the grave." The article says that the school-to-work program will train and not educate. Schlafly is the president of the Eagle Forum, a organization that stands for the fundamental right of parents to guide the education of their own children, thinks that "school-to-work is a direct threat to the individual student, his or her privacy, his or her goals and his or her acquisition of an education that can help him reach them." Schlafly's opinion wrong and will not pass in today's society.

In Schlafly's criticism, she states that the school-to-work program "deemphasizes or eliminates academic work and substitutes mandated vocational training to better serve the workforce." She also says that "instead of the focus being on developing the child, the focus is on developing a labor force." Schlafly thinks that school-to-work is training rather then education. In contrast to Schlafly, Olson says that school-to-work give students

"motivation" which will help students because students in today's society are not motivated enough. Surveys prove that students describe education as "boring." Schlafly believes that the STW law stating that vocational training starts "at the earliest possible age..." is wrong. The reason is that she believes that elementary or middle school children do not know what career they want to fulfill. The last point in Schlafly's article is she states that "big businesses support school-to-work because they think that vocational courses in high school for illiterate or semi-illiterate students will train young Americans to compete in the global economy with people in the third world willing to work for 25 and 50 cents an hour." She is basically saying that big businesses are supporting school-to-work because they want some cheap labor. In conclusion to her article, Schlafly says that "all those who value freedom must defeat and defund school-to-work." She thinks that school-to-work is oppressing the students from their freedom to learn and receive a good education.

Schlafly says that "big businesses support school-to-work" because it will provide them with cheap labor. Where did Schlafly get this information? Throughout the whole article there is no proof of justifying this idea. She also mentions that governors support th

Some common words found in the essay are:
Marc Tucker's, Schlafly Olson, Eagle Forum, Train Educate, Phyllis Schlafly, olson school-to-work, Programs September, support school-to-work, businesses governors, german system, school-to-work program, vocational training, training education, cheap labor, elementary middle school, schlafly's article, school-to-work cheap labor, serve workforce, businesses support school-to-work,

Approximate Word count = 905
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)

Category: Miscellaneous

join now Save Paper

Saved Paper

Save your papers so you can locate them quickly!

Newest Essays

Testimonials

"Thank You So Much!!! You have saved me once again!!!"
Jack M.
"With so many papers to chose from, I was able to get ideas to help me with all of my classes. Thank You!"
Brian P.
"I've used this site for the last 3 years to help me come up with ideas for my papers."
Sara J.
"I use this site every week to help me write my own papers!"
Rachel W.
"I love this site!!!"
Marie N.

Critique On School to Work Programs

Related Essays

Professional Essays

Saved Paper

Newest Essays

Testimonials