Napster
In the controversy against Napster, many supporters fight to keep their freedom alive. This case is about whether the plaintiffs can use their control of music copyrights to achieve control over Napster's decentralized technology and prevent it from transforming the Internet in ways that might undermine their present chokehold on music promotion and distribution. This small state of affairs has caused a huge clash in the way the people of the United States feel about their freedom of free music. I believe that mp3’s and Napster have been a gateway for introducing unknown bands and spreading overpopulated songs to the ones who cannot buy CD’s or even get a CD player. Napster is a device that shares, not steals. Supporting Napster is probably one of the best things a person can do because we are fighting for the right of the freedom of free music. There are so many bands out there that no one has even heard of. These bands have very few ways of making them stand out above the crowd. But how can they do this without lots of money and tons of publ
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Using Napster, Napster Controversy, Ulrich Technologies, College Spreading, Metallica CDs, Supporting Napster, Lars Ulrich, CDs CD, Tower Records, free music, freedom free, freedom free music, radio television, controversy napster,
Approximate Word count = 731
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
 |
