Euthanasia: the right to live or to die.

Clinics and society face today the problem of euthanasia, which deals with life and death. For some, is saving a life and for other, is to kill one. Euthanasia not only relates to medicines and society, but also with religion. There is a distinction to be made in terms of euthanasia; it deals with passive and active euthanasia. According to the religion, nobody but God has the right to give a life or take it away. But at the same time, technology plays a role on it, since in most cases, the patient is kept alive due to the machines. This can also be considered a violation of God rules, since then patient will no longer live if the machines are off. “Euthanasia comes from the Greek word “good” or “merciful” death. It is the art of painlessly putting to death persons suffering from incurable conditions or disease. Active euthanasia is an intentional act that causes death. Passive euthanasia is an intentional act to avoid prolonging the dying process.”(Euthanasia, 2)

Euthanasia is a very controversial issue today since it struggles with the right to die or to live. It is necessary to define what is to be a human being: a person living or a vegetative person living. To what extend i

. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
, American Association, terminally ill, passive euthanasia, active euthanasia, Harper Row, Jennifer Reiling, Euthanasia JAMA, V281 March, passive active, euthanasia deals, quality life, Jennifer Euphoria, Euthanasia York, patient terminally ill, medical field, religion god, euthanasia intentional, euthanasia intentional act, life meaning, passive active euthanasia, terminally ill patients, applying passive euthanasia,
Approximate Word count = 1123
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)