terrorism
Almost immediately, the general consensus was that it was an obvious act of sabotage, most likely terrorism, and the FBI immediately began a parallel investigation into possible criminal involvement. This seemed to be the right direction due to the fact that any other accident that has occurred under similar circumstance has been an act of sabotage. Despite this, it was only one of many theories on the "What-if Wall": bombs, fuel vapors, engine fuse, and several others that were about to be proved or disproved. The two years of the Flight 800 investigation were filled with delays, dramas, and disagreements. Politicians were, at points, dictating the direction of the investigation, agents from the FBI and NTSB fought over the handling of evidence The first of the problems developed as the investigation was just beginning, while their investigation was officially "parallel", every piece of evidence recovered passed through the FBI's hands before reaching the NTSB. One problem was one of communication between the two groups of investigators, in one instance the NTSB left an FBI agent behind at the dock when going to the crash site. Another problem was the FBI's tight-lipped policy
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
What-if Wall, White House, FBI NTSB, Jim Kallstrom, TWA Flight, NTSB Learning, NY NTSB, Salanger Media, Bob Francis, what-if wall, due accident, agents fbi, act sabotage, aircraft accident, factor investigation,
Approximate Word count = 872
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
 |
