"A political victory, a rise of rents, the recovery of your sick, or the return of your absent friend, or some other favorable event, raises your spirits, and you think good days are preparing for you. Do not believe it. Nothing can bring you peace but yourself. Nothing can bring you peace but the triumph of principles." In these concluding lines of Ralph Waldo Emerson's essay, he once again pounds his beliefs in nonconformatism across to the reader.

The examples of Jay Gatspy, in The Great Gatspy, and George Babbitt, in Babbitt support Emerson's strong convictions. Jay Gatspy lived a financially comfortable life but spent all of his time living not for himself, but living for his long love for Dazy, a married woman. And George Babbitt was even more ignorant. Conformatism was this man's middle name! The only thing this poor man ever thought about was impressing his "so-called" high class friends.

This type of attitude brought both of these men sorrow, and even killed one of them. There is no doubt that Emerson had some great thoughts in his essay, but in my opinion his strong belief in nonconformatism is wrong as is confromatism itself. Instead of taking an extreme "right

Babbitt was so mediocre that he couldn't even enjoy sex with his own wife. His sex life was about as satisfying as Al Bundie, from the show "Married With Children." Babbitt's wife, Myra, had a noisy presence. As a housekeeper and a cook she had lost Babbitt's interest shortly after he married her. Her character serves as Babbitt's domestic anchor and also a millstone around his neck. Babbitt and Myra rarely spoke of important matters. They simply spoke about superficial about such things as material possessions and costly goods-the only thing they had in common.

George F. Babbitt was so weak-minded that the terms babbittry and mediocrity go hand and hand. To be a Babbitt or to be guilty of babbittry is to behave just as he did. It means that in one's private life one should. For example, Babbitt would read the morning paper just to store up opinions from the editorial pages to regurgitate later with business associates when it is necessary to impress someone or settle arguments. Babbitt had few opinions of his own; his opinions were articulated by other people. Parroting editorials was Babbitt's way of learning and acquiring wisdom. Memorizing phrases and attitudes of politically conversative editorials was done every morning over coffee. It was one of Babbitt's daily rituals.

Another character we can analyze is Joe Gatspy. Some people may compare Gatspy and Babbitt and come to the conclusion that they were virtually the same. However, I have come to the conclusion that even though Gatspy and Babbitt had some similar characteristics, they were very different at the same time.

In analyzing a character such as George Babbitt, it is very simple to support Emerson's extreme claims of pro-individualism. Like many people that lived in the early 20th century, Babbitt seemed to define what we call mediocrity. He was a man that lived his life in fear of being an outcast of society, and only had ambitions of raising his social status, no matter what the cost. He was a man who wanted, craved, and needed a daily routine, and was filled with uneasiness if that routine was ever broken. He would publicly proclaim his beliefs, which coincided those of society, and numerous times would even sacri

Some common words found in the essay are:
George Babbitt, Reliance Transcendentalism, Joe Gatspy, Maybe Emerson's, Beneath Babbitt's, E S, Babbitt Gatspy, Socrates Galileo, Children Babbitt's, Maybe Dazy, joe gatspy, george babbitt, little bit, emerson's essay, hard words, joe gatspy self, gatspy self, bring peace, self reliance, lived life, comfortable life,
Approximate Word count = 1501
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)