Sanctity of life

“Each person possesses an inviolability founded on justice that even the welfare of society as a whole cannot override.” It is because I so strongly concur with this quote by Joseph Thurof, that I compelled to affirm today’s resolution; be it resolved that the individual ought to value the sanctity of life above the quality of life. Before moving on, I would like to define a few key terms that clearly pertain to the realms of this resolution. An individual is defined by Oxford English Dictionary, as a self-conscious or rational being and ought is a moral obligation. The sanctity of life is defined by the encyclopedia of Bioethics as the intrinsic value of life and that all life is equally important and the quality of life is defined as the relative and unequal value to human lives on the basis of the possible consequences of variable qualities.

My value in today’s round is that of morality. Morality is defined as the principles of right and wrong in relation to human action and character and is prominent in today’s round because the individual has a moral obligation not to kill him or herself. Individuals have the right to life, endowin

. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Contention Individuals, English Dictionary, Encyclopedia Bioethics, Joseph Thurof, quality life, Quality Life, moral obligation, his/her life, sanctity life, life quality life, todays round, life quality, BIRT Individual, sanctity life quality, inherent worth, life means, individual ought, individual moral, individual moral obligation, moral obligation preserve, inherent worth individuals,
Approximate Word count = 1014
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)